ppll

Related posts

Robin Hanson x.com

I asked this question as someone I might debate claimed that God existing is an example of an unverifiable fact, for which one needn't have probabilities.

probabilitiesclaimeddebate

The the words it uses that this site has seen least often elsewhere. Posts are matched on those words alone — nothing here is a summary of this one.

Sources

Top people

20 September

Robin Hansonx.com

  • Related

18 September

Ethan MollickKorrents

17 September

Tiago Fortex.com

  • Related

Alex Tabarrokx.com

  • Related

Kris Abdelmessihx.com

  • Related

16 September

Rob Hendersonx.com

  • robkhenderson.com

    Related

Matthew YglesiasKorrents

15 September

Rob Hendersonx.com
  • Related

Nassim Nicholas Talebx.com

  • Related

13 September

Jeffrey Zeldmanx.com

  • nytimes.com

    Related

Naval RavikantKorrents

12 September

Zvi MowshowitzKorrents

11 September

Olivier Blanchardx.com

  • Related

Daniel Lemirex.com

  • OpenAIRelated

Joey HessMastodon

  • Related

Noah SmithKorrents

Nathan LambertKorrents

10 September

François Cholletx.com

  • Related

Nathan LambertKorrents

9 September

Shane Parrishx.com

  • Related

8 September

Peter SingerBluesky

  • youtube.com

    Related

Nick MaggiulliBlog

  • Living Poor to Die Rich

    Related

1 September

Jessamyn WestMastodon

  • scholarship.law.wm.edu

    Related

29 August

Sabine HossenfelderBlog

27 August

Scott GreenfieldKorrents

25 August

20 August

Aswath Damodaranx.com

  • bit.ly

    OpenAIRelated

18 August

11 August

Tim Urbanx.com

  • Related

10 August

8 August

29 July

Alexandr WangKorrents

17 July

Emily AtkinKorrents

30 June

Chris SmajeKorrents

19 June

Aswath Damodaranx.com
  • bit.ly

    AnthropicOpenAIRelated

13 June

Charity Majorsx.com

  • Related

6 June

1 March

danah boydBluesky

  • Related

24 February

Paul KrugmanKorrents

18 February

Dan MeyerNewsletter

25 January

8 January

Julia EvansKorrents

1 January

26 November 2025

Peter SingerNewsletter

9 September 2025

Vicki BoykisSite

  • Walking around the app

    LLMsRelated

4 September 2025

David HoneKorrents

11 August 2025

9 June 2025

Matthew GreenBlog

17 April 2025

Eugene YanBluesky

  • Related

21 March 2025

Colin PercivalSite

  • Chunking attacks on Tarsnap (and others)

    Related

21 January 2025

Oliver W. KimKorrents

19 January 2025

Jennifer BurnsKorrents

22 December 2024

Adam FrankKorrents

1 October 2023

Tyler CowenKorrents

29 August 2023

Anton HowesKorrents

17 February 2023

Tim UrbanKorrents

1 June 2022

Sabine HossenfelderPapers
  • The wave function as a true ensemble

    Related

20 February 2022

Haley Nahmanx.com

  • haleynahman.substack.com

    Related

30 September 2020

Tim UrbanBlog

27 July 2017

David SpiegelhalterPapers

What is a korrent?

A korrent is a belief a person has stated in their own words: one sentence stating the claim, backed by a quote and a source, kept at korrents.com.

Under a name here, the quoted block is what they actually said. The korrent beneath it is the claim those words support, in korrents' wording — tap it to see the record, its source, and who else holds it.

Nobody here wrote their own korrents. They are compiled from public statements, and a person can change their mind, which is recorded too.

About the English under a post

Some people here publish in a language other than English. Where they do, this site shows a machine translation beneath the post, in this typeface — the site's own, not theirs.

The post itself is never changed, moved or hidden: what is set in the serif above is exactly what the person published, and it is what to quote them on. A translation can be wrong in ways that matter, especially about tone.

Only the post's own words are translated. A quoted post, a linked article and a belief on korrents.com are left in their original language.