ppll

Related posts

Jennifer Pahlka Newsletter

Outcomes Review: Realigning Legislative Incentives

legislatureoutputsincentives

The the words it uses that this site has seen least often elsewhere. Posts are matched on those words alone — nothing here is a summary of this one.

Sources

Top people

18 September

Ethan MollickKorrents

17 September

Dean W. Ballx.com

  • Related

14 September

Branko MilanovicKorrents

11 September

Casey NewtonKorrents

10 September

Naval RavikantKorrents

1 September

Ajeya CotraKorrents

31 August

Byrne HobartNewsletter

Ethan MollickKorrents

29 August

28 August

Patrick McKenziex.com

  • governmentRelated

23 August

Awais Aftabx.com

  • psychiatrymargins.com

    Related

22 August

Jennifer PahlkaKorrents

21 August

Vitalik ButerinKorrents

20 August

Jennifer PahlkaNewsletter

11 August

Gergely OroszNewsletter

10 August

Freddie deBoerNewsletter

Sanjay Bakshix.com

  • solarAnthropicRelated

5 August

Amelia Wattenbergerx.com

  • Related

3 August

Terence EdenRecommends

  • Recommendsaffiliate linkrcmnd.app

    The Field Guide to Understanding 'Human Error'

    Their words

    This is such a useful book. It makes the case that there's no such thing as "human error" - instead most catastrophes are caused by system issues, misaligned incentives, and unrealistic processes. You are not the custodian of an otherwise safe system that you need to protect from erratic human beings.

    shkspr.mobi

29 July

20 July

Jennifer PahlkaNewsletter

9 July

Tiago ForteKorrents

8 July

Terence TaoKorrents

7 July

26 June

Noam BrownKorrents

15 June

Rohit KrishnanKorrents

26 May

Rohit KrishnanKorrents

From one piece Who Audits the Auditors? 2 beliefs, in the piece's order there

3 May

Eugene YanKorrents

22 April

Martin KleppmannKorrents

2 April

Vitalik ButerinRecommends
  • Dislikedrcmnd.app

    Local Deep Research

    Their words

    Its responses are, in my view, pretty bland and not very high-quality. I did a side-by-side test of asking Local Deep Research a question, then asking pi the same question (telling it to use searxng to make as many internet searches as needed), and I fed both outputs into an LLM to ask which is better.

    vitalik.eth.limo

15 December 2025

Michael LewisKorrents

19 October 2025

28 September 2025

Freddie deBoerKorrents

2 September 2025

Benedict EvansKorrents

13 August 2025

Keyu JinKorrents

1 July 2025

19 June 2025

Miles BrundageKorrents

12 June 2025

Armin RonacherRecommends

  • Likedrcmnd.app

    Claude Sonnet

    Their words

    I exclusively use the cheaper Sonnet model. It’s perfectly adequate for my needs, and in fact, I prefer its outputs over the more expensive Opus model.

    lucumr.pocoo.org

21 May 2025

Ed ZitronKorrents

15 February 2025

Miles BrundageKorrents

14 February 2025

Terry CavanaghMastodon

  • Related

3 February 2025

Nathan LambertKorrents

From one piece DeepSeek, China, OpenAI, NVIDIA, xAI, TSMC, Stargate, and AI Megaclusters | Lex Fridman Podcast #459 2 beliefs, in the piece's order there

16 January 2025

25 July 2024

15 June 2024

Philip KoopmanBlog

  • Academic Publishing, AI, and Broken Incentives

    Related

20 February 2024

Bill AckmanKorrents

From one piece Bill Ackman: Investing, Financial Battles, Harvard, DEI, X & Free Speech | Lex Fridman Podcast #413 2 beliefs, in the piece's order there

16 January 2024

Chip HuyenKorrents

17 November 2023

John MearsheimerKorrents

15 November 2023

Sebastian RuderKorrents

31 October 2023

Adam Mastroiannix.com

10 October 2023

Chip HuyenKorrents

3 October 2023

Robin HansonKorrents

10 June 2022

Eliezer YudkowskyKorrents

4 March 2022

Jan LeikeKorrents

25 January 2022

Marc AndreessenKorrents

23 February 2020

Jason CrawfordKorrents

23 April 2017

Sriram KrishnanBlog

  • Building something no one else can measure

    Related

What is a korrent?

A korrent is a belief a person has stated in their own words: one sentence stating the claim, backed by a quote and a source, kept at korrents.com.

Under a name here, the quoted block is what they actually said. The korrent beneath it is the claim those words support, in korrents' wording — tap it to see the record, its source, and who else holds it.

Nobody here wrote their own korrents. They are compiled from public statements, and a person can change their mind, which is recorded too.

About the English under a post

Some people here publish in a language other than English. Where they do, this site shows a machine translation beneath the post, in this typeface — the site's own, not theirs.

The post itself is never changed, moved or hidden: what is set in the serif above is exactly what the person published, and it is what to quote them on. A translation can be wrong in ways that matter, especially about tone.

Only the post's own words are translated. A quoted post, a linked article and a belief on korrents.com are left in their original language.