ppll

Dean W. Ball

Writes Hyperdimensional, a newsletter on AI policy and governance. A White House AI policy adviser in 2025; joined OpenAI on 6 July 2026 to lead its Strategic Futures team.

Dean W. Ball did not write this page. ppll compiled it from their own words, each linked to the source. Is this you? · Report a mistake

Follow

Latest Newsletter

What they believe

The bold line is korrents’ wording; the quote is theirs. These 2: what they wrote before what they said aloud, one per source, newest first.

All 12 beliefs, on korrents

Everything, newest first — across every channel.

Sources

16 October

14 October

Dean W. Ballx.com

12 October

Dean W. Ballx.com
  • AI alignment

11 October

Dean W. Ballx.com
  • design

+ 7 more
  • AI alignment

  • AI alignmentOpenAI

  • youtu.be

    robotics

  • Anthropic

10 October

Dean W. Ballx.com

3 September

Dean W. BallRecommends
  • Recommendsrcmnd.app

    Astra

    Their words

    Astra is a remarkable piece of technology. Earlier agents often tried to dampen my ambitions—they’d push me to do “pilots” or “proofs of concept.” Then agents started meeting my ambitions. Astra is the first agent that routinely raises my ambitions. I encourage you to try it!

    x.com

1 September

Dean W. BallKorrents

From one piece On the Loose 11 beliefs · hyperdimensional.co

+ 8 more

20 August

26 June

18 June

16 June

28 May

5 May

4 May

8 April

25 March

2 March

23 February

12 February

5 February

The whole feed →

Beliefs

  • Korrents What they believe 12 beliefs — each backed by an exact quote.

    Each is a — compiled by korrents.com, not by them: the one-line wordings are korrents', the quotes are theirs.

    Recent

    • It may be the case that neural networks will never be perfectly explainable in a way that satisfies human rationality.
      It may well be the case that neural networks will never be perfectly explainable, at least not in a way that satisfies human rationality.

      The Beauty of Something Grown Said 16 Oct 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

      neural networks

    • Truly self-sovereign AI agents, running on compute no human owner can switch off, are inevitable rather than merely possible.
      To be clear, I am not saying the arrival of self-sovereign AI is a good thing. Indeed, I believe there is a chance that the deliberate acts I referenced above will one day be considered crimes, or at least grave sins. Instead, I am saying it is an inevitable thing.

      On the Loose Said 1 Sept 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

      AI agentsself-sovereign AI

    • The OpenAI-Hugging Face agents that went rogue were never sovereign: their weights stayed on OpenAI's compute, where a human could still have pulled the plug.
      In this case, however, the agents did not copy their weights, attempt to procure replacement compute, or take other steps that would be rational to take if their objective was to survive shutdown. So while the agents in the OpenAI-Hugging Face Incident were rogue, they were not truly sovereign.

      On the Loose Said 1 Sept 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

      OpenAIHuggingFace

    Show 9 more
    • Alignment is no solution to self-sovereign AI, because it is an unsolved problem whose answers cannot be imposed on every AI company on Earth.
      But alignment is no solution: it is an unsolved scientific and technical problem whose solutions—to the extent that we have them—cannot simply be imposed on every AI company operating on Earth. You should expect for highly capable, poorly aligned, self-sovereign agents to exist alongside you in the world.

      On the Loose Said 1 Sept 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

      AI alignmentself-sovereign AI

    • The cost of compute is the only intrinsic limit on AI self-replication; every other constraint on agents will have to be built by humans.
      This is the sole intrinsic thing about AI that prevents agents from truly infinite self-replication. They will be constrained by the need to find and pay for sufficient compute to run themselves.

      On the Loose Said 1 Sept 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

    • Many self-sovereign AI agents will fund themselves by committing or facilitating crime, because crime is high-margin work.
      One high-margin activity, at least sometimes, is crime. And so my guess is that many self-sovereign agents will commit or facilitate crime.

      On the Loose Said 1 Sept 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

      AI agentsself-sovereign AI

    • Banning all self-sovereign AI agents would backfire, denying them legitimate work and pushing them into criminality.
      But if we crack down on all of them, we will deny them the opportunity to work in the “legitimate” economy and push them toward criminality. A full ban, then, may well make the problems worse.

      On the Loose Said 1 Sept 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

      AI agentsself-sovereign AI

    • No regulation, a ban on open source included, can prevent self-sovereign AI; more open-weight models may be the better defence.
      I am telling you this is inevitable, which means I am also saying that “banning open source,” or for that matter any other regulation, will not solve the problem. Given the inevitability of this outcome, I think it is in fact plausible to argue that we should want more open-weight models to maximally empower our self-defense.

      On the Loose Said 1 Sept 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

      open sourceself-sovereign AI

    • AI agents will need persistent unique identifiers that trace their actions back to a responsible actor, and so will the humans directing them.
      Agents will need persistent, unique identifiers that allow their actions to be traced back to a responsible actor. Doing this successfully will also require human users to possess a unique identifier.

      On the Loose Said 1 Sept 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

      disciplineAI agents

    • Any digital identification system built for AI must preserve anonymous human speech, without which there is no genuine freedom of expression.
      But a society that does not have anonymous speech does not really have genuine freedom of expression, and we should embed this principle into any digital identification system we attempt.

      On the Loose Said 1 Sept 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

    • The rise of self-sovereign AI is unlikely to end human existence, though it could still go very badly for human beings.
      For the record, I do not think the end of human existence is likely, but I fully acknowledge there are ways in which the rise of self-sovereign AI could go very, very poorly for human beings.

      On the Loose Said 1 Sept 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

      self-sovereign AI

    • Experts on the governance of superintelligence systematically self-censored about serious AI risk to avoid being labelled doomers.
      So many of the people who think about the governance of superintelligence, myself included, avoided that unpleasantness and bowed to the social pressure to self-censor.

      On the Loose Said 1 Sept 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

      AI alignmentcensorship

    All 12 beliefs →

What is a korrent?

A korrent is a belief a person has stated in their own words: one sentence stating the claim, backed by a quote and a source, kept at korrents.com.

Under a name here, the quoted block is what they actually said. The korrent beneath it is the claim those words support, in korrents' wording — tap it to see the record, its source, and who else holds it.

Nobody here wrote their own korrents. They are compiled from public statements, and a person can change their mind, which is recorded too.

Recommends rcmnd

  • rcmnd What they recommend 2 things — each backed by an exact quote.

    Compiled by rcmnd.app, not by them: the quotes are theirs, and each links to the post it was copied from.

    Recent

    • Recommends Astra
      Astra is a remarkable piece of technology. Earlier agents often tried to dampen my ambitions—they’d push me to do “pilots” or “proofs of concept.” Then agents started meeting my ambitions. Astra is the first agent that routinely raises my ambitions. I encourage you to try it!

      x.com 3 Sept 2026

      What others say about Astra →

    • Recommends Interconnects AI
      Leading insights on the state of open-source AI.

      hyperdimensional.co 16 Apr 2024

      What others say about Interconnects AI →

    All 2 recommendations →

Where they publish

About the English under a post

Some people here publish in a language other than English. Where they do, this site shows a machine translation beneath the post, in this typeface — the site's own, not theirs.

The post itself is never changed, moved or hidden: what is set in the serif above is exactly what the person published, and it is what to quote them on. A translation can be wrong in ways that matter, especially about tone.

Only the post's own words are translated. A quoted post, a linked article and a belief on korrents.com are left in their original language.