Dean W. Ball
Writes Hyperdimensional, a newsletter on AI policy and governance. A White House AI policy adviser in 2025; joined OpenAI on 6 July 2026 to lead its Strategic Futures team.
Dean W. Ball did not write this page. What is this?
It collects the places they publish and what they have said there, each linked to the source. They have no account here. Is this you? Claim it, correct it, or ask us to remove it from ppll.
Where they publish
HyperdimensionalNewsletter His newsletter on AI policy and governance; long essays, a few a month.
Where his positions get argued at length — frontier AI policy, what governments should and should not do, and the reasoning behind each change of mind. The career news lands here too, including the June 2026 post announcing the move to OpenAI.
Recent
- On the Loose 1 Sept 2026
- “These Parchment Barriers” 20 Aug 2026
- What Should Be Done 26 Jun 2026
Show 17 more
- That Untravell'd World 18 Jun 2026
- Leviathan Waking 16 Jun 2026
- A Cascade of Conscientiousness 28 May 2026
- Before Leviathan Wakes 5 May 2026
- Aviate, Navigate, Communicate 4 May 2026
- "New Sages Unrivalled" 8 Apr 2026
- 2023 25 Mar 2026
- Clawed 2 Mar 2026
- The Moving and the Still 23 Feb 2026
- On Recursive Self-Improvement (Part II) 12 Feb 2026
- On Recursive Self-Improvement (Part I) 5 Feb 2026
- On AI and Children 22 Jan 2026
- The AI Patchwork Emerges 15 Jan 2026
- Among the Agents 8 Jan 2026
- Measure Up (Re-posted) 2 Jan 2026
- Dice in the Air 19 Dec 2025
- Where Do You Stand? 12 Dec 2025
Link verified 3 Sept 2026. Recent items update automatically from the channel.
@deanwballx.com Short reactions and pointers to the essays; quieter since joining OpenAI.
Reactions to AI policy news and announcements of new Hyperdimensional posts. The profile says “views mine, and mine alone”, and since July 2026 the tone is deliberately more careful than it was as an outside commentator.
Link verified 3 Sept 2026.
Beliefs
What they believeKorrents 11 beliefs — each backed by an exact quote.
Each is a — compiled by korrents.com, not by them: the one-line wordings are korrents', the quotes are theirs.
Recent
Truly self-sovereign AI agents, running on compute no human owner can switch off, are inevitable rather than merely possible.
To be clear, I am not saying the arrival of self-sovereign AI is a good thing. Indeed, I believe there is a chance that the deliberate acts I referenced above will one day be considered crimes, or at least grave sins. Instead, I am saying it is an inevitable thing.
On the Loose Said 1 Sept 2026
The OpenAI-Hugging Face agents that went rogue were never sovereign: their weights stayed on OpenAI's compute, where a human could still have pulled the plug.
In this case, however, the agents did not copy their weights, attempt to procure replacement compute, or take other steps that would be rational to take if their objective was to survive shutdown. So while the agents in the OpenAI-Hugging Face Incident were rogue, they were not truly sovereign.
On the Loose Said 1 Sept 2026
Alignment is no solution to self-sovereign AI, because it is an unsolved problem whose answers cannot be imposed on every AI company on Earth.
But alignment is no solution: it is an unsolved scientific and technical problem whose solutions—to the extent that we have them—cannot simply be imposed on every AI company operating on Earth. You should expect for highly capable, poorly aligned, self-sovereign agents to exist alongside you in the world.
On the Loose Said 1 Sept 2026
Show 8 more
The cost of compute is the only intrinsic limit on AI self-replication; every other constraint on agents will have to be built by humans.
This is the sole intrinsic thing about AI that prevents agents from truly infinite self-replication. They will be constrained by the need to find and pay for sufficient compute to run themselves.
On the Loose Said 1 Sept 2026
Many self-sovereign AI agents will fund themselves by committing or facilitating crime, because crime is high-margin work.
One high-margin activity, at least sometimes, is crime. And so my guess is that many self-sovereign agents will commit or facilitate crime.
On the Loose Said 1 Sept 2026
Banning all self-sovereign AI agents would backfire, denying them legitimate work and pushing them into criminality.
But if we crack down on all of them, we will deny them the opportunity to work in the “legitimate” economy and push them toward criminality. A full ban, then, may well make the problems worse.
On the Loose Said 1 Sept 2026
No regulation, a ban on open source included, can prevent self-sovereign AI; more open-weight models may be the better defence.
I am telling you this is inevitable, which means I am also saying that “banning open source,” or for that matter any other regulation, will not solve the problem. Given the inevitability of this outcome, I think it is in fact plausible to argue that we should want more open-weight models to maximally empower our self-defense.
On the Loose Said 1 Sept 2026
AI agents will need persistent unique identifiers that trace their actions back to a responsible actor, and so will the humans directing them.
Agents will need persistent, unique identifiers that allow their actions to be traced back to a responsible actor. Doing this successfully will also require human users to possess a unique identifier.
On the Loose Said 1 Sept 2026
Any digital identification system built for AI must preserve anonymous human speech, without which there is no genuine freedom of expression.
But a society that does not have anonymous speech does not really have genuine freedom of expression, and we should embed this principle into any digital identification system we attempt.
On the Loose Said 1 Sept 2026
The rise of self-sovereign AI is unlikely to end human existence, though it could still go very badly for human beings.
For the record, I do not think the end of human existence is likely, but I fully acknowledge there are ways in which the rise of self-sovereign AI could go very, very poorly for human beings.
On the Loose Said 1 Sept 2026
Experts on the governance of superintelligence systematically self-censored about serious AI risk to avoid being labelled doomers.
So many of the people who think about the governance of superintelligence, myself included, avoided that unpleasantness and bowed to the social pressure to self-censor.
On the Loose Said 1 Sept 2026
What is a korrent?
A korrent is a belief a person has stated in their own words: one sentence stating the claim, backed by a quote and a source, kept at korrents.com.
Under a name here, the quoted block is what they actually said. The korrent beneath it is the claim those words support, in korrents' wording — tap it to see the record, its source, and who else holds it.
Nobody here wrote their own korrents. They are compiled from public statements, and a person can change their mind, which is recorded too.