Alex Telford
Writes about the biotech industry, drug development and forecasting — “I write to learn, mostly about biotech.”
Alex Telford did not write this page. What is this?
It collects the places they publish and what they have said there, each linked to the source. They have no account here. Is this you? Claim it, correct it, or ask us to remove it from ppll.
Where they publish
Blog Alex's blog His blog on biotech, medicine and forecasting. Has a feed.
Recent
- Going direct: notes on Eli Lilly at a trillion 7 Dec 2025
- Thoughts on the future of software development as a non-developer 3 Aug 2025
- Will all our drugs come from China? 20 Dec 2024
Show 7 more
- A new breed of biotech 17 Sept 2024
- Some questions about biotech that I find interesting 1 Apr 2024
- The pharma industry from Paul Janssen to today: why drugs got harder to develop and what we can do about it 23 Dec 2023
- Latent optima 17 Nov 2023 All data is the result of some selection process. The first order manifestation of this is bias: a failure to select a representative sample of the real underlying thing the data is describing. But selection operates at…
- Concepts of health and disease as a barrier to progress 11 Oct 2023 This essay was the runner-up in the Homeworld Ideas writing contest. To read it on the Homeworld website, click here.
- An Enhertu innovation map 24 Aug 2023
- Intelligence as efficient model building 17 May 2023
Link verified 20 Sept 2026. Recent items update automatically from the channel.
Beliefs
Korrents What they believe 12 beliefs — each backed by an exact quote.
Each is a — compiled by korrents.com, not by them: the one-line wordings are korrents', the quotes are theirs.
Recent
The West has not yet internalised that China is a source of genuinely new drugs, not just a maker of ingredients and copies.
I don’t think many in the West have yet fully internalized a mental model of China as a source of genuine innovation.
Will all our drugs come from China? Said 20 Dec 2024
China now starts about a quarter of the world's new clinical trials, more than Europe does.
Chinese companies are now responsible for about a quarter of new trial starts — more than Europe.
Will all our drugs come from China? Said 20 Dec 2024
A computational discovery platform does not make a biotech fast, because the thousand other steps of drug development are still the bottleneck.
Another challenge for Class II biotechs is that even if you have a nifty computational drug discovery platform, you are still often bottlenecked by the rest of the drug development process. It takes 1,000 (or more!) small steps to advance a drug through discovery, development, and past the regulators.
A new breed of biotech Said 17 Sept 2024
Show 9 more
A drug discovery scientist starting today will probably retire without ever having worked on a drug that reached the market.
Such prolificacy is unlikely to be repeated any time soon; if current trends hold, a drug discovery scientist starting their career today is likely to retire without ever having worked on a single drug that makes it to market.
The pharma industry from Paul Janssen to today: why drugs got harder to develop and what we can do about it Said 23 Dec 2023
The pharmaceutical productivity crisis has no single villain: nearly every part of discovery and development got gradually harder and more expensive at once.
In reality, the productivity crisis in the pharmaceutical industry is the culmination of decades of just about every aspect of drug discovery and development getting gradually harder and more expensive.
The pharma industry from Paul Janssen to today: why drugs got harder to develop and what we can do about it Said 23 Dec 2023
Pharmaceutical R&D productivity has fallen for decades: far more money spent per drug, with no matching improvement in the odds a candidate reaches the market.
The cost to discover and develop a drug today is orders of magnitude higher than in the 1950s. Despite this, the probability that a drug entering clinical trials will eventually reach the market has hardly improved in the intervening years.
The pharma industry from Paul Janssen to today: why drugs got harder to develop and what we can do about it Said 23 Dec 2023
The hard part of drug discovery is knowing what to make - which target is worth drugging - not designing the molecule.
The most significant factor preventing us from taking better molecules into clinical trials is not our ability to design arbitrary molecules, but our (lack of) understanding of underlying disease biology. In other words, we often know how to make something, but not what to make.
The pharma industry from Paul Janssen to today: why drugs got harder to develop and what we can do about it Said 23 Dec 2023
No amount of animal testing can guarantee a drug is safe in humans, so human volunteers must carry some irreducible risk for medicine to advance.
Biology is unpredictable, especially when the immune system is involved, and there is no guarantee that a drug that appears safe in animals will be safe in humans.
The pharma industry from Paul Janssen to today: why drugs got harder to develop and what we can do about it Said 23 Dec 2023
Clinical trials cost what they do because they are complex, bureaucratic and reliant on highly skilled labour.
Clinical trials are expensive because they are complex, bureaucratic, and reliant on highly skilled labour.
The pharma industry from Paul Janssen to today: why drugs got harder to develop and what we can do about it Said 23 Dec 2023
How long a trial takes decides which diseases get drugs at all, because capital flows to the indications whose endpoints can be measured quickly.
Because patents have fixed term lengths, with small extensions to compensate for the year or so when the drug is under regulatory review, drug developers are incentivized to go after conditions where clinical trials can be completed quickly, all else being equal.
The pharma industry from Paul Janssen to today: why drugs got harder to develop and what we can do about it Said 23 Dec 2023
Deep learning is not yet ready for the task that would actually add value in drug development: predicting safety and efficacy in humans.
it will take time for deep learning systems and training data to mature enough to be useful for the truly value-adding task of predicting safety and efficacy in humans
The pharma industry from Paul Janssen to today: why drugs got harder to develop and what we can do about it Said 23 Dec 2023
Regulatory and social tolerance for drug risk falls over time, and the ratchet is almost never loosened.
it seems to be broadly true that regulatory and societal tolerance for risk declines with time
The pharma industry from Paul Janssen to today: why drugs got harder to develop and what we can do about it Said 23 Dec 2023
Beliefs others hold too
Pharmaceutical R&D productivity has fallen for decades: far more money spent per drug, with no matching improvement in the odds a candidate reaches the market. 2 hold this
The cost to discover and develop a drug today is orders of magnitude higher than in the 1950s. Despite this, the probability that a drug entering clinical trials will eventually reach the market has hardly improved in the intervening years.
The pharma industry from Paul Janssen to today: why drugs got harder to develop and what we can do about it Said 23 Dec 2023
The hard part of drug discovery is knowing what to make - which target is worth drugging - not designing the molecule. 2 hold this
The most significant factor preventing us from taking better molecules into clinical trials is not our ability to design arbitrary molecules, but our (lack of) understanding of underlying disease biology. In other words, we often know how to make something, but not what to make.
The pharma industry from Paul Janssen to today: why drugs got harder to develop and what we can do about it Said 23 Dec 2023
How long a trial takes decides which diseases get drugs at all, because capital flows to the indications whose endpoints can be measured quickly. 2 hold this
Because patents have fixed term lengths, with small extensions to compensate for the year or so when the drug is under regulatory review, drug developers are incentivized to go after conditions where clinical trials can be completed quickly, all else being equal.
The pharma industry from Paul Janssen to today: why drugs got harder to develop and what we can do about it Said 23 Dec 2023
What is a korrent?
A korrent is a belief a person has stated in their own words: one sentence stating the claim, backed by a quote and a source, kept at korrents.com.
Under a name here, the quoted block is what they actually said. The korrent beneath it is the claim those words support, in korrents' wording — tap it to see the record, its source, and who else holds it.
Nobody here wrote their own korrents. They are compiled from public statements, and a person can change their mind, which is recorded too.
Feed
As its own page →Hiding
7 December 2025
3 August 2025
20 December 2024
From one piece Will all our drugs come from China? 2 beliefs · atelfo.github.io
-
korrents.com
China now starts about a quarter of the world's new clinical trials, more than Europe does.Their words
Chinese companies are now responsible for about a quarter of new trial starts — more than Europe.
-
Their words
I don’t think many in the West have yet fully internalized a mental model of China as a source of genuine innovation.
17 September 2024
-
Their words
Another challenge for Class II biotechs is that even if you have a nifty computational drug discovery platform, you are still often bottlenecked by the rest of the drug development process. It takes 1,000 (or more!) small steps to advance a drug through discovery, development, and past the regulators.
1 April 2024
23 December 2023
From one piece The pharma industry from Paul Janssen to today: why drugs got harder to develop and what we can do about it 9 beliefs · atelfo.github.io
-
korrents.com
Regulatory and social tolerance for drug risk falls over time, and the ratchet is almost never loosened.Their words
it seems to be broadly true that regulatory and societal tolerance for risk declines with time
-
Their words
it will take time for deep learning systems and training data to mature enough to be useful for the truly value-adding task of predicting safety and efficacy in humans
-
Their words
Because patents have fixed term lengths, with small extensions to compensate for the year or so when the drug is under regulatory review, drug developers are incentivized to go after conditions where clinical trials can be completed quickly, all else being equal.
+ 6 more
-
korrents.com
Clinical trials cost what they do because they are complex, bureaucratic and reliant on highly skilled labour.Their words
Clinical trials are expensive because they are complex, bureaucratic, and reliant on highly skilled labour.
-
Their words
Biology is unpredictable, especially when the immune system is involved, and there is no guarantee that a drug that appears safe in animals will be safe in humans.
-
Their words
The most significant factor preventing us from taking better molecules into clinical trials is not our ability to design arbitrary molecules, but our (lack of) understanding of underlying disease biology. In other words, we often know how to make something, but not what to make.
-
Their words
The cost to discover and develop a drug today is orders of magnitude higher than in the 1950s. Despite this, the probability that a drug entering clinical trials will eventually reach the market has hardly improved in the intervening years.
-
Their words
In reality, the productivity crisis in the pharmaceutical industry is the culmination of decades of just about every aspect of drug discovery and development getting gradually harder and more expensive.
-
Their words
Such prolificacy is unlikely to be repeated any time soon; if current trends hold, a drug discovery scientist starting their career today is likely to retire without ever having worked on a single drug that makes it to market.
17 November 2023
11 October 2023
24 August 2023
17 May 2023
Nothing matches.
About the English under a post
Some people here publish in a language other than English. Where they do, this site shows a machine translation beneath the post, in this typeface — the site's own, not theirs.
The post itself is never changed, moved or hidden: what is set in the serif above is exactly what the person published, and it is what to quote them on. A translation can be wrong in ways that matter, especially about tone.
Only the post's own words are translated. A quoted post, a linked article and a belief on korrents.com are left in their original language.