Demis Hassabis
Co-founder and CEO of Google DeepMind, and a 2024 Nobel laureate in Chemistry for the protein-structure work behind AlphaFold.
Demis Hassabis did not write this page. What is this?
It collects the places they publish and what they have said there, each linked to the source. They have no account here. Is this you? Claim it, correct it, or ask us to remove it from ppll.
Where they publish
No channels checked yet. We list a place only once someone has opened it and confirmed it is theirs, so this stays empty rather than guessing.
Beliefs
Korrents What they believe 24 beliefs — each backed by an exact quote.
Each is a — compiled by korrents.com, not by them: the one-line wordings are korrents', the quotes are theirs.
Recent
Anything nature shaped can be learned efficiently by a classical neural network, because evolutionary processes leave structure behind.
And I think the reason that's possible is that in nature, natural systems have structure because they were subject to evolutionary processes that shape them. And if that's true, then you can maybe learn what that structure is.
Demis Hassabis: Future of AI, Simulating Reality, Physics and Video Games | Lex Fridman Podcast #475 Said 23 Jul 2025
Information is the most fundamental unit of the universe, more fundamental than energy or matter.
And it sort of fits with the way I think about physics in general, which is that I think information is primary, information is the most sort of fundamental unit of the universe, more fundamental than energy and matter.
Demis Hassabis: Future of AI, Simulating Reality, Physics and Video Games | Lex Fridman Podcast #475 Said 23 Jul 2025
We have not scratched the surface of what classical, non-quantum computers can do; they can already go far further than anyone expected.
I think we've proven, and the AI community in general that classical systems, Turing machines can go a lot further than we previously thought. They can do things like model the structures of proteins and play go to better than world champion level. And a lot of people would've thought maybe 10, 20 years ago that was decades away, or maybe you would need some sort of quantum machines to quantum systems to be able to do things like protein folding. And so I think we haven't really even sort of scratched the surface yet of what classical systems so-called could do.
Demis Hassabis: Future of AI, Simulating Reality, Physics and Video Games | Lex Fridman Podcast #475 Said 23 Jul 2025
Show 21 more
A model that can predict the next frames of a video coherently understands the world, in the only sense of the word that is doing any work.
I think to the extent that it can predict the next frames in a coherent way, that is a form of understanding, not in the anthropomorphic version of, it's not some kind of deep philosophical understanding of what's going on, I don't think these systems have that, but they certainly have modeled enough of the dynamics, put it that way
Demis Hassabis: Future of AI, Simulating Reality, Physics and Video Games | Lex Fridman Podcast #475 Said 23 Jul 2025
Intuitive physics can be learned from passive observation alone, so an embodied robot is not required to understand the physical world.
But it seems like you can understand it through passive observation, which is pretty surprising to me. And again, I think hints at something underlying about the nature of reality in my opinion, beyond just the cool videos that it generates.
Demis Hassabis: Future of AI, Simulating Reality, Physics and Video Games | Lex Fridman Podcast #475 Said 23 Jul 2025
Coming up with a good conjecture is harder than solving one, and that taste for the right question is what separates great scientists from good ones.
So picking the right question is the hardest part of science and making the right hypothesis. And that's what today's systems definitely they can't do. So I often say it's harder to come up with a conjecture, a really good conjecture than it is to solve it.
Demis Hassabis: Future of AI, Simulating Reality, Physics and Video Games | Lex Fridman Podcast #475 Said 23 Jul 2025
There is a coin-flip chance that AGI arrives by 2030.
My estimate is sort of 50% chance by in the next five years, so by 2030 let's say. So I think there's a good chance that that could happen.
Demis Hassabis: Future of AI, Simulating Reality, Physics and Video Games | Lex Fridman Podcast #475 Said 23 Jul 2025
The real test of AGI is handing the system to a few hundred of the world's top experts and finding that none of them can locate an obvious flaw.
And maybe also make the system available to a few hundred of the world's top experts, the Terence Taos of each subject area and give them a month or two and see if they can find an obvious flaw in the system. And if they can't, then I think you can be pretty confident we have a fully general system.
Demis Hassabis: Future of AI, Simulating Reality, Physics and Video Games | Lex Fridman Podcast #475 Said 23 Jul 2025
An end-to-end self-improving AI is probably possible, but it is not even desirable, because it is a hard-takeoff scenario.
I mean potentially that's possible. I would say I'm not sure it's even desirable because that's a kind of hard takeoff scenario.
Demis Hassabis: Future of AI, Simulating Reality, Physics and Video Games | Lex Fridman Podcast #475 Said 23 Jul 2025
Scaling what we already have, with no further breakthroughs, will be enough to reach AGI.
And so we don't know, I would say it's kind of 50/50 whether new things are needed or whether the scaling the existing stuff is going to be enough.
Demis Hassabis: Future of AI, Simulating Reality, Physics and Video Games | Lex Fridman Podcast #475 Said 23 Jul 2025
AI will not run out of data, because there is already enough real-world data to build the simulators that generate more of it.
Do you have enough data to make simulations, so that you can create more synthetic data that are from the right distribution? Obviously that's the key. So you need enough real-world data in order to be able to create those kinds of data generators, and I think that we're at that step at the moment.
Demis Hassabis: Future of AI, Simulating Reality, Physics and Video Games | Lex Fridman Podcast #475 Said 23 Jul 2025
Fusion and solar are the two energy sources worth betting on, and solar's limiting problem is batteries and transmission.
I think fusion and solar are the two that I would bet on. Solar, I mean it's the fusion reactor in the sky of course, and I think really the problem there is batteries and transmission.
Demis Hassabis: Future of AI, Simulating Reality, Physics and Video Games | Lex Fridman Podcast #475 Said 23 Jul 2025
AI will have ten times the impact of the Industrial Revolution and arrive ten times faster, which is what will make it hard for society to absorb.
And the thing that's going to be harder to deal with this time around is that I think what we're going to see is something like probably 10 times the impact the Industrial Revolution had, but 10 times faster as well. So instead of a 100 years, it takes 10 years and so that's going to make, it's like a 100X, the impact and the speed combined.
Demis Hassabis: Future of AI, Simulating Reality, Physics and Video Games | Lex Fridman Podcast #475 Said 23 Jul 2025
The productivity AI creates should be shared out as a universal basic provision, with rare skills still buying you more than that.
Including things like universal basic provision or something like that where a lot of the increased productivity gets shared out and distributed to society and maybe in the form of services and other things where if you want more than that, you still go and get some incredibly rare skills and things like that and make yourself unique. But there's a basic provision that is provided.
Demis Hassabis: Future of AI, Simulating Reality, Physics and Video Games | Lex Fridman Podcast #475 Said 23 Jul 2025
Quoting a number for P(doom) is a ridiculous notion, because it implies a precision that nobody actually has.
Well, look, I don't have a P-Doom number. The reason I don't is because I think it would imply a level of precision that is not there. So I don't know how people are getting their P-Doom numbers. I think it's a little bit of ridiculous notion because what I would say is it's definitely non-zero and it's probably non-negligible.
Demis Hassabis: Future of AI, Simulating Reality, Physics and Video Games | Lex Fridman Podcast #475 Said 23 Jul 2025
The brain is doing classical computation, not quantum, so everything it does can in principle be mimicked by a classical computer.
So my betting is that it's mostly it is just classical computing that's going on in the brain, which suggests that all the phenomena are modelable or mimicable by a classical computer.
Demis Hassabis: Future of AI, Simulating Reality, Physics and Video Games | Lex Fridman Podcast #475 Said 23 Jul 2025
Meta is not at the AI frontier, and buying talent with enormous salaries is the rational move for a company that is behind.
And Meta right now are not at the frontier. Maybe they'll manage to get back on there and it's probably rational what they're doing from their perspective because they're behind and they need to do something. But I think there's more important things than just money.
Demis Hassabis: Future of AI, Simulating Reality, Physics and Video Games | Lex Fridman Podcast #475 Said 23 Jul 2025
The last steps to AGI should be taken by a CERN-style international research project, not a Manhattan Project.
I hope we'll end up with something more collaborative if needed, more like a CERN project where it's research-focused and the best minds in the world come together to carefully complete the final steps and make sure it's responsibly done before deploying it to the world.
Demis Hassabis: Future of AI, Simulating Reality, Physics and Video Games | Lex Fridman Podcast #475 Said 23 Jul 2025
Today's text-box chat interfaces are too restricted to survive multimodal models, and will look archaic within a couple of years.
Shouldn't it be something more like Minority Report where you are sort of vibing with it in a kind of collaborative way? It seems very restricted today. I think we'll look back on today's interfaces and products and systems as quite archaic in maybe in just a couple of years.
Demis Hassabis: Future of AI, Simulating Reality, Physics and Video Games | Lex Fridman Podcast #475 Said 23 Jul 2025
AI will not replace the best programmers; it will make them ten times more productive than they are today.
So the great programmers will be even better, but there'll be even 10X even what they are today. And because there, you'll be able to use their skills to utilize the tools to the maximum, exploit them to the maximum.
Demis Hassabis: Future of AI, Simulating Reality, Physics and Video Games | Lex Fridman Podcast #475 Said 23 Jul 2025
Accurate computational approaches are needed to close the protein structural coverage gap and enable large-scale structural bioinformatics.
Accurate computational approaches are needed to address this gap and to enable large-scale structural bioinformatics.
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold (with 33 co-authors) Said 15 Jul 2021
Existing protein structure prediction methods fall far short of atomic accuracy when no homologous structure is available.
Despite recent progress10-14, existing methods fall far short of atomic accuracy, especially when no homologous structure is available.
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold (with 33 co-authors) Said 15 Jul 2021
A computational method can regularly predict protein structures with atomic accuracy even when no similar structure is known.
Here we provide the first computational method that can regularly predict protein structures with atomic accuracy even in cases in which no similar structure is known.
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold (with 33 co-authors) Said 15 Jul 2021
Contemporary physical and evolutionary structure-prediction approaches fall far short of experimental accuracy without a close experimental homologue, limiting biological utility.
Despite these advances, contemporary physical and evolutionary-history-based approaches produce predictions that are far short of experimental accuracy in the majority of cases in which a close homologue has not been solved experimentally and this has limited their utility for many biological applications.
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold (with 33 co-authors) Said 15 Jul 2021
What is a korrent?
A korrent is a belief a person has stated in their own words: one sentence stating the claim, backed by a quote and a source, kept at korrents.com.
Under a name here, the quoted block is what they actually said. The korrent beneath it is the claim those words support, in korrents' wording — tap it to see the record, its source, and who else holds it.
Nobody here wrote their own korrents. They are compiled from public statements, and a person can change their mind, which is recorded too.
About the English under a post
Some people here publish in a language other than English. Where they do, this site shows a machine translation beneath the post, in this typeface — the site's own, not theirs.
The post itself is never changed, moved or hidden: what is set in the serif above is exactly what the person published, and it is what to quote them on. A translation can be wrong in ways that matter, especially about tone.
Only the post's own words are translated. A quoted post, a linked article and a belief on korrents.com are left in their original language.