ppll

Anil Dash

Writer and technology executive; blogs at anildash.com, was CEO of Glitch, and helped build Movable Type and ThinkUp.

Anil Dash did not write this page. ppll compiled it from their own words, each linked to the source. Is this you? · Report a mistake

Follow

Latest Bluesky

What they believe

The bold line is korrents’ wording; the quote is theirs. These 2: what they wrote before what they said aloud, one per source, newest first.

All 19 beliefs, on korrents

Everything, newest first — across every channel.

Sources

19 October

Anil DashBluesky

18 October

Anil DashBluesky
  • America

17 October

Anil DashBluesky

6 October

Anil DashBlog
  • We are going to kill “unalive”

29 September

Anil DashBlog
  • The Facebook Fake-out

11 September

Anil DashBlog
  • At 25, we are all New Yorkers, again

9 September

4 September

2 September

21 August

Anil DashKorrents

From one piece Why shaming people about AI slop isn’t enough to stop Big AI 3 beliefs · anildash.com

20 August

24 July

Anil DashBlog
  • Becoming Skilled at Making Documents

23 June

Anil DashBlog
  • How we’ll fight the platform war against Big AI

15 June

30 April

Anil DashKorrents

From one piece Why are the Artemis II photos on Flickr? 3 beliefs · anildash.com

The whole feed →

Beliefs

  • Korrents What they believe 19 beliefs — each backed by an exact quote.

    Each is a — compiled by korrents.com, not by them: the one-line wordings are korrents', the quotes are theirs.

    Recent

    Show 16 more
    • People often keep using large tech platforms whose harms they object to because of the platforms' coercive power over their lives.
      There are millions of people who don't like that they're using LLMs provided by the Big AI companies, but end up using them anyway.

      Maybe it's time for lots of little indie AIs to take over Said 15 Jun 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

      LLMs

    • Platforms run by technically capable, well-intentioned people can preserve content more reliably over decades than typical government or corporate web infrastructure.
      In contrast, platforms that are run by technically fluent, well-intentioned and thoughtful technologists can be very effective in maintaining content over a timescale of decades.

      Why are the Artemis II photos on Flickr? Said 30 Apr 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

      governmentinfrastructure

    • Large AI companies have used creators' permissively-licensed work without seeking their consent or offering compensation.
      the incredibly positive and generous intent of these open licenses has since been exploited by extractive Big AI companies, who ransacked all of the images on Flickr that had permissive licenses without any consent from, or compensation to, the creators.

      Why are the Artemis II photos on Flickr? Said 30 Apr 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

    • Authoritarian governments seek to destroy or falsify public records, including digital ones.
      The traditional authoritarian impulse to destroy or falsify the public record has not spared the digital realm under the current administration.

      Why are the Artemis II photos on Flickr? Said 30 Apr 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

    • AI works best when it solves a specific problem for a particular community rather than trying to be all things to all people.
      And that's the way AI should work - solving a specific problem for a particular community, instead of trying to be all things to all people, which is when these platforms start becoming unaccountable and start harming massive numbers of people.

      (One) Good AI Is Here Said 28 Apr 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

    • The harmful behaviors of major AI companies -- training without consent, opaque code, no user control -- are choices, not unavoidable features of the technology.
      The Big AI companies that take content without consent, or who refuse to let people see their code, or who insist they can't give people control over how their models run and whether they are responsible about their environmental impact can now be definitively refuted.

      (One) Good AI Is Here Said 28 Apr 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

    • Public sentiment is turning against tech companies that force unwanted features on their users.
      I think the tide is turning, and people are so fed up with the software-brained CEOs forcing things on them that they don't want.

      (One) Good AI Is Here Said 28 Apr 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

    • The bargain that funded the open web was that a crawler could take your pages because it would send you readers; an AI crawler that sends nobody has broken it.
      The deal was always simple: search engines had permission to crawl sites because they were going to be sending users to those sites. If they're hitting your site half a million times for every one user they send to your site, all they're giving you is higher costs.

      Endgame for the Open Web Said 27 Mar 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

    • Whether the open web survives will be decided by what ordinary people collectively do, not by the companies that profit from it.
      Whether or not they succeed is going to be decided by decisions that we all make as a community in the coming months.

      Endgame for the Open Web Said 27 Mar 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

    • The web is being flooded with coherent, generic, generated text that buries the writing worth reading.
      As publishers see the danger from AI bots expand, they retreat to putting more and more content behind either password protection or payment walls or both, leaving the only publicly-accessible content to be AI-generated slop; open resources like research work, scientific analysis, and fair use of content all suffer as a result of people responding to the bad actors, since legitimate uses of open content are no longer possible.

      Endgame for the Open Web Said 27 Mar 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

    • Closing off interoperability is how a platform locks people in, and that lock-in is what lets the service be made worse without losing them.
      Meanwhile, others like Spotify and Netflix leverage their dominant positions in the market to coerce creators to abandon open podcasts entirely, in favor of proprietary formats that require listeners to be on those platforms — locking in both creators and their audiences so they are stuck as they begin the enshittification process.

      Endgame for the Open Web Said 27 Mar 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

    • A browser that answers with generated prose instead of links is not a web browser but an anti-web browser, and it hides that substitution from the person using it.
      Atlas is a browser, but it is not a web browser. It is an anti-web browser.

      ChatGPT's Atlas: The Browser That's Anti-Web Said 22 Oct 2025

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

      writing

    • A generated answer that looks like a page of search results but contains no link to the subject's own site has quietly removed the web from the reader's view.
      I had typed "Taylor Swift" in a browser, and the response had literally zero links to Taylor Swift's actual website. If you stayed within what Atlas generated, you would have no way of knowing that Taylor Swift has a website at all.

      ChatGPT's Atlas: The Browser That's Anti-Web Said 22 Oct 2025

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

    • People need an online identity that outlives the platforms hosting it, which is why it should live on a domain they control rather than as a handle on somebody else's site.
      This was a sensible reaction to the realization that big sites rise and fall in popularity, but that regular people need an identity that persists longer than those sites do.

      The Web We Lost Said 13 Dec 2012

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

    • Attaching advertising revenue to links changed the web for the worse, because a link stopped being an act of expression and became a transaction.
      The web was an interesting and different place before links got monetized, but by 2007 it was clear that Google had changed the web forever, and for the worse, by corrupting links.

      The Web We Lost Said 13 Dec 2012

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

      Google

    • Platforms wrongly believe that giving users flexibility and control makes a product too complex to grow, and that belief is the root of most of their mistakes.
      The primary fallacy that underpins many of their mistakes is that user flexibility and control necessarily lead to a user experience complexity that hurts growth.

      The Web We Lost Said 13 Dec 2012

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

      design

    Beliefs others hold too

    • The web is being flooded with coherent, generic, generated text that buries the writing worth reading. 3 hold this
      As publishers see the danger from AI bots expand, they retreat to putting more and more content behind either password protection or payment walls or both, leaving the only publicly-accessible content to be AI-generated slop; open resources like research work, scientific analysis, and fair use of content all suffer as a result of people responding to the bad actors, since legitimate uses of open content are no longer possible.

      Endgame for the Open Web Said 27 Mar 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

    • Whether the open web survives will be decided by what ordinary people collectively do, not by the companies that profit from it. 2 hold this
      Whether or not they succeed is going to be decided by decisions that we all make as a community in the coming months.

      Endgame for the Open Web Said 27 Mar 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

    • Closing off interoperability is how a platform locks people in, and that lock-in is what lets the service be made worse without losing them. 2 hold this
      Meanwhile, others like Spotify and Netflix leverage their dominant positions in the market to coerce creators to abandon open podcasts entirely, in favor of proprietary formats that require listeners to be on those platforms — locking in both creators and their audiences so they are stuck as they begin the enshittification process.

      Endgame for the Open Web Said 27 Mar 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

    All 19 beliefs →

What is a korrent?

A korrent is a belief a person has stated in their own words: one sentence stating the claim, backed by a quote and a source, kept at korrents.com.

Under a name here, the quoted block is what they actually said. The korrent beneath it is the claim those words support, in korrents' wording — tap it to see the record, its source, and who else holds it.

Nobody here wrote their own korrents. They are compiled from public statements, and a person can change their mind, which is recorded too.

Recommends rcmnd

  • rcmnd What they recommend 13 things — each backed by an exact quote.

    Compiled by rcmnd.app, not by them: the quotes are theirs, and each links to the post it was copied from.

    Recent

    • Liked iChat
      I also probably use iChat more than any other app, and feel like it gets a bit less credit than it deserves.

      usesthis.com 7 May 2011

      What others say about iChat →

    • Loved MacBook Air (11-inch)
      I’m not a big hardware fetishist, but I have to say it’s my favorite laptop I’ve ever owned, and remarkably fast.

      usesthis.com 7 May 2011

      What others say about MacBook Air (11-inch) →

    • Loved Dropbox
      And increasingly, across all these platforms and scenarios, I find my work all grounded in DropBox. It may be one of the more revolutionary apps I've ever used, and makes me excited about it as a platform like nothing I've seen since the early days of MS Office.

      usesthis.com 7 May 2011

      What others say about Dropbox →

    Show 10 more

    All 13 recommendations →

Where they publish

About the English under a post

Some people here publish in a language other than English. Where they do, this site shows a machine translation beneath the post, in this typeface — the site's own, not theirs.

The post itself is never changed, moved or hidden: what is set in the serif above is exactly what the person published, and it is what to quote them on. A translation can be wrong in ways that matter, especially about tone.

Only the post's own words are translated. A quoted post, a linked article and a belief on korrents.com are left in their original language.