ppll

Related posts

Dan Shipper x.com

this is a very good and well designed report however, two impt assumptions in it that significantly change the analysis once you start to play with it: 1. the report assumes that jobs can be decomposed into tasks 2. the report models human tasks created by automation always as a fraction of automated tasks. in other words, the underlying assumptions is automation always reduces human labor (or at best leaves it the same) taken in reverse order: does automation always reduce human work? in my experience, the answer is no. automation often creates multiples more work for humans. i have a full a…

assumesassumptionsreduces

The the words it uses that this site has seen least often elsewhere. Posts are matched on those words alone — nothing here is a summary of this one.

Sources

Top people

11 September

Ben ThompsonKorrents

10 September

Zed Shawx.com

  • science.org

    Related

7 September

Paul KrugmanKorrents

3 September

Paul FordBluesky

  • Related

26 August

Emil Kowalskix.com

  • Related

21 August

Rohit KrishnanKorrents

13 July

11 July

Sriram KrishnanKorrents

1 May

12 February

Austin VernonKorrents

25 January

12 December 2025

Irving FinkelKorrents

28 November 2025

Jonathan GagnéKorrents

27 November 2025

Brendan GreggKorrents

22 October 2025

Charles Fain LehmanKorrents

21 May 2025

Brendan GreggKorrents

15 May 2025

Hannah RitchieKorrents

2 December 2024

Diederik P. Kingmax.com

  • Related

What is a korrent?

A korrent is a belief a person has stated in their own words: one sentence stating the claim, backed by a quote and a source, kept at korrents.com.

Under a name here, the quoted block is what they actually said. The korrent beneath it is the claim those words support, in korrents' wording — tap it to see the record, its source, and who else holds it.

Nobody here wrote their own korrents. They are compiled from public statements, and a person can change their mind, which is recorded too.

About the English under a post

Some people here publish in a language other than English. Where they do, this site shows a machine translation beneath the post, in this typeface — the site's own, not theirs.

The post itself is never changed, moved or hidden: what is set in the serif above is exactly what the person published, and it is what to quote them on. A translation can be wrong in ways that matter, especially about tone.

Only the post's own words are translated. A quoted post, a linked article and a belief on korrents.com are left in their original language.