ppll

Jeff Dean

Computer scientist; at Google from 1999 to 2026, where he co-created MapReduce, Bigtable, TensorFlow and the TPU, led Google AI from 2018 to 2023 and was chief scientist from 2023 to 2026. Co-founded the AI research start-up Discovery Loop in 2026.

Jeff Dean did not write this page. ppll compiled it from their own words, each linked to the source. Is this you? · Report a mistake

Follow

What they believe

The bold line is korrents’ wording; the quote is theirs. These one: what they wrote before what they said aloud, one per source, newest first.

All 22 beliefs, on korrents

Everything, newest first — across every channel.

Sources

30 July

Jeff DeanKorrents

From one piece Jeff Dean: The 1% Rule for Building in AI 15 beliefs · youtube.com

+ 12 more

28 February 2017

Jeff DeanRecommends
  • Usesrcmnd.app

    HP Z620

    Their words

    At work, I mostly use an HP Z620 Workstation with an NVidia GPU card in it, running Linux, with a single 30" monitor.

    usesthis.com

  • Usesrcmnd.app

    MacBook Air

    Their words

    For portable uses and for giving talks, I rely primarily on a MacBook Air and sometimes on a Chromebook Pixel.

    usesthis.com

  • Usestheir ownrcmnd.app

    Nexus 9

    Their words

    I have a Nexus 5X Android phone, and also use a Nexus 9 tablet for surfing the web and reading ebooks and technical papers.

    usesthis.com

+ 6 more
  • Usesrcmnd.app

    emacs

    Their words

    For writing code, I use emacs and Google's internal distributed build system (a version of which was open sourced as Bazel) and our version control system

    usesthis.com

  • Usestheir ownrcmnd.app

    Google Docs

    Their words

    For writing, commenting and collaborating on internal technical documents, I use Google Docs.

    usesthis.com

  • Usesrcmnd.app

    LaTeX

    Their words

    For technical papers, I and my coauthors usually use LaTeX. For giving presentations, I almost exclusively use Google Slides.

    usesthis.com

  • Usestheir ownrcmnd.app

    Google Slides

    Their words

    For giving presentations, I almost exclusively use Google Slides.

    usesthis.com

  • Usestheir ownrcmnd.app

    GMail

    Their words

    For handling email, I use GMail with lots of filters to automatically file and label message (I get about 1400 email messages per day, so I have to be quite efficient to deal with it all in a reasonable amount of time).

    usesthis.com

  • Usesrcmnd.app

    C++

    Their words

    Most of the code I write is in C++, although I've written fair amounts of code in Java, Python, Perl, Self, Cecil, x86 assembly, and Pascal over the years.

    usesthis.com

The whole feed →

Beliefs

  • Korrents What they believe 22 beliefs — each backed by an exact quote.

    Each is a — compiled by korrents.com, not by them: the one-line wordings are korrents', the quotes are theirs.

    Recent

    • AI models have reached the level of a junior engineer on longer-running, agent-based coding tasks.
      Yeah, I mean I feel like uh the models have been getting a lot better at sort of agent-based longer running coding tasks and it seems pretty clear that they are now actually pretty capable and depending on exactly your definition of of junior engineer it seems pretty spot-on I would say.

      Jeff Dean: The 1% Rule for Building in AI Said 30 Jul 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

    • Good ideas come from asking how you would solve a problem from first principles, rather than staying anchored on how it is solved today.
      you know, because sometimes if you just squint at a problem and you think about not necessarily being anchored on exactly how that problem is solved today, but how you would solve it from first principles, you can come up with really good ideas that are, you know, maybe not what other people are thinking about.

      Jeff Dean: The 1% Rule for Building in AI Said 30 Jul 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

    • Inference, not training, is now the constraint, and specialized low-energy hardware will beat general-purpose GPUs and TPUs on latency.
      Yeah, I mean it's a little different, but I think uh you're going to see more and more uh uh high performance and um low energy uh inference hardware systems because I think everyone is now realizing that inference is the key to making you know these agent-based systems be available to more and more people and that latency is really important and that specialization of the hardware is a really key way you can make uh things that are more energy efficient and lower latency than more general purpose uh computational devices like say GPUs or TPUs

      Jeff Dean: The 1% Rule for Building in AI Said 30 Jul 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

      energysemiconductors

    Show 19 more
    • Agents can already be run for days or weeks on a single hard problem, and almost nobody has internalised that.
      I mean I think um probably one thing is people don't quite realize how possible it is to have you know agent-based systems that can run not just for an hour or two hours on a problem you care about but for some problem domains and with highly capable models underlying them you can get them to run for days or weeks and do really really complicated tasks

      Jeff Dean: The 1% Rule for Building in AI Said 30 Jul 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

    • A chip that can do nothing but low-precision dense linear algebra is enough for machine learning, even though it cannot run Chrome.
      And um if you build a specialized chip for low precision dense linear algebra and can't do anything else that turns out to be really useful for machine learning inference uh even though it can't run Chrome or Word or whatever.

      Jeff Dean: The 1% Rule for Building in AI Said 30 Jul 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

    • The numbers an AI engineer should know by heart are memory bandwidths and the energy cost of a single operation.
      Yeah, I mean I think if you looked at what is important in AI systems these days, you would want to know things like the bandwidth between you know your main memory system on your accelerator to the onchip memory to the um you know the multiplier unit or whatever. You want to know how much energy does it take to do a single multiplier operation.

      Jeff Dean: The 1% Rule for Building in AI Said 30 Jul 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

      energy

    • Batching exists only because moving data costs about a thousand times more energy than computing on it.
      Um because if you didn't have that thousandx difference then you know you wouldn't have to do batching but you have to do batching of you know many examples or maybe many tokens at once in order to amortize that data movement

      Jeff Dean: The 1% Rule for Building in AI Said 30 Jul 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

      energy

    • What sits in a model's context is far clearer to it than its training data, which is trillions of tokens stirred into a soup of parameters.
      And the nice thing about that is that information is really clear to the model, unlike the training data the model was trained on where it's all kind of like trillions of tokens stirred together into a soup of of hundreds of billions or trillions of parameters, but it's all less clear than the actual context uh that the model sees directly for this particular problem or uses use case.

      Jeff Dean: The 1% Rule for Building in AI Said 30 Jul 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

    • You improve a model you cannot retrain by writing better guidelines and skills for it, not by adjusting its parameters.
      And often you can actually make the model work better and succeed at that kind of problem by not just adjusting the model parameters which is hard to do from the outside but from you know creating better guidelines for the model you know writing skills for the model to know how to use different tools that would be incredibly useful for solving this particular class of problem.

      Jeff Dean: The 1% Rule for Building in AI Said 30 Jul 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

    • Long-running agents fail because they drift off the distribution they were trained on, and degrade further the farther out they get.
      Um, and sometimes that's because the model is trying to do something it doesn't have a lot of experience doing. So it's been trained on a whole set of things and as soon as you get a little bit off the distribution of things it knows how to do then like most machine learning models it will you know its performance will suddenly will start to degrade and the farther you get off the comfort zone of what it knows how to do the the more likely it is to to not work as well.

      Jeff Dean: The 1% Rule for Building in AI Said 30 Jul 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

    • Spending compute at inference time to search over plausible solutions is the general fix for unreliable long agent runs.
      Um, and that's a very very useful general technique is you know inference time compute to perform search over plausible ways of solving the problem that can get much much higher performance or much more reliability in longunning agent flows.

      Jeff Dean: The 1% Rule for Building in AI Said 30 Jul 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

    • Before building on a gap in the general models, work out whether that gap survives six months or three years.
      Um but I I would also caution that the general models are definitely getting better at a broader and broader range of things. So you have to figure out, you know, is that thing you're working on, is that going to be a durable thing or do you think the models uh at the forefront are going to get better at that in the next six months or 12 months or is it something they're not going to be able to do for a couple years or three years? And you know, you you want to weigh that as you're as you're deciding what to work on.

      Jeff Dean: The 1% Rule for Building in AI Said 30 Jul 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

    • Build where today's models succeed one percent of the time, not twenty: partial success means the capability is already arriving.
      And if they're completely failing, that's probably a good sign. If they're kind of able to do some of it but not very well, that's maybe not a great sign because that's a probably a a sign that the capability is starting to be present in those models and with more training data or larger scale models or or whatever it's likely to get better. So um you know look for something where the model succeeds 0% or 1% of the time not not 20%.

      Jeff Dean: The 1% Rule for Building in AI Said 30 Jul 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

    • A startup's durable advantage over a general model is having visibility into data the general model will never see.
      Yeah, I mean I think uh sometimes it's uh a product that you build that might have access to particular kind of data that the underlying model might not the a general model. So it might be you're building something to help users organize all their own personal information and the model won't necessarily have access to that. And so there you can have a big advantage because all of a sudden your model has visibility or your product has visibility into important data.

      Jeff Dean: The 1% Rule for Building in AI Said 30 Jul 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

      startups

    • A narrow, highly accurate model can beat a general one inside its own domain, as AlphaFold did, and materials science and chip design are next.
      I mean I think like if you look at uh my colleagues work on say alpha fold that was a very specific model for uh protein folding and it was highly successful um and was able to really handle that domain quite well so that all of a sudden you now have this amazing tool and model that can give you answers to questions about proteins and their structure um really effectively um but it's not a general model it's a very specific one and there are other I domains where that kind of approach can work really well. Uh maybe in material science or chip design or things like that that uh will enable you to leverage the capabilities of a very accurate but but niche model uh to do things that are hard today.

      Jeff Dean: The 1% Rule for Building in AI Said 30 Jul 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

      designprotein structure prediction

    • Specifying what you want matters more now that agents write the code than it did when the work went to a human who could ask follow-up questions.
      So we've always told computer scientists from the very beginning that really it's really important to specify what it is, what's the software that you're writing is trying to accomplish before then going and writing it. And so now we actually have agent-based systems that can do the writing, but the importance of specifying what what it is you want has actually gone up because before you'd be handing it off to a very intelligent human who maybe has context or can ask you follow-up questions.

      Jeff Dean: The 1% Rule for Building in AI Said 30 Jul 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

    • Translating software from one programming language to another is where coding agents already excel, because the existing code is a perfect specification.
      Um, and to give you an example of a a a use of a coding agent that works extremely well is you can ask today's models to translate software from one computer language to another very effectively because in that case you actually have a incredibly detailed specification.

      Jeff Dean: The 1% Rule for Building in AI Said 30 Jul 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

      coding agents

    • When agents do the building, the scarce skill is taste: choosing which problem is worth the time at all.
      Yeah, I mean I think it's really having incredibly good taste in what you ask your agents to work on, right? That is the the crux of you know from my background uh a research problem. You know, a researcher can have all the tools and all the techniques, but often most of the battle is what problem are you gonna spend your time on?

      Jeff Dean: The 1% Rule for Building in AI Said 30 Jul 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

      taste

    • Taste can be trained deliberately: write down what you think will matter in twelve months, then go back in twelve months and score yourself.
      Um, another way you can get more experience for yourself is to just write down a bunch of things you think might be important in the next 12 months. And maybe you pick one of them to work on, but go back and evaluate in 12 months of these other things, which ones actually seemed important or which ones did other people in the world go out and and create and which ones did they did not seem to do yet.

      Jeff Dean: The 1% Rule for Building in AI Said 30 Jul 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

      taste

    • Learned approximations of slow simulators change what science is possible, by turning a six-month screening run into something you do over lunch.
      And I think there's a lot of room in a lot of domains for much faster validation models, possibly learned valu validation models that can uh you know get you a a approximation to the true answer much much more rapidly. And that changes how those experimental loops can be thought of and how quickly you can go around those loops.

      Jeff Dean: The 1% Rule for Building in AI Said 30 Jul 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

    • There is no real impediment to models running their own research loop and improving themselves at a far more rapid rate.
      Um but I think there's no uh you know real impediment to making that be a much more automated loop where the model itself decides it's going to explore or maybe with a nudge from some people uh at the various highest level like oh why don't you try some new ideas around model architectures that incorporate this and then it will go run lots of experiments uh see which ones work and then those will get incorporated at a much more rapid rate

      Jeff Dean: The 1% Rule for Building in AI Said 30 Jul 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

    • Today's models see a thousand times more data than an eighteen-year-old and are no better for it, so far more data-efficient algorithms must be possible.
      If you think about our large scale models today, they probably see a thousand times as much data as a human does by the age of 18. Yet, the human by the age of 18 is better in a lot of things and, you know, on par uh with those frontier models that have seen way more data. So could you come up with much more data efficient systems that can learn continuously learn from their own actions?

      Jeff Dean: The 1% Rule for Building in AI Said 30 Jul 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

    All 22 beliefs →

What is a korrent?

A korrent is a belief a person has stated in their own words: one sentence stating the claim, backed by a quote and a source, kept at korrents.com.

Under a name here, the quoted block is what they actually said. The korrent beneath it is the claim those words support, in korrents' wording — tap it to see the record, its source, and who else holds it.

Nobody here wrote their own korrents. They are compiled from public statements, and a person can change their mind, which is recorded too.

Recommends rcmnd

About the English under a post

Some people here publish in a language other than English. Where they do, this site shows a machine translation beneath the post, in this typeface — the site's own, not theirs.

The post itself is never changed, moved or hidden: what is set in the serif above is exactly what the person published, and it is what to quote them on. A translation can be wrong in ways that matter, especially about tone.

Only the post's own words are translated. A quoted post, a linked article and a belief on korrents.com are left in their original language.