Ilya Sutskever
Co-founder and chief scientist of Safe Superintelligence Inc., and previously co-founder and chief scientist of OpenAI.
Ilya Sutskever did not write this page. What is this?
It collects the places they publish and what they have said there, each linked to the source. They have no account here. Is this you? Claim it, correct it, or ask us to remove it from ppll.
Where they publish
No channels checked yet. We list a place only once someone has opened it and confirmed it is theirs, so this stays empty rather than guessing.
Beliefs
Korrents What they believe 28 beliefs — each backed by an exact quote.
Each is a — compiled by korrents.com, not by them: the one-line wordings are korrents', the quotes are theirs.
Recent
Models look far better on evals than they are in the world because researchers, inadvertently, take inspiration from the evals when they build RL environments.
And one of the one thing you could do, and I think that's something that is done inadvertently, is that people take inspiration from the evals.
Ilya Sutskever – We're moving from the age of scaling to the age of research Said 25 Nov 2025
Today's models are the student who drilled 10,000 hours for the programming contest, which is exactly why what they learn does not carry anywhere else.
The models are much more like the first student but even more because then we say okay so the model should be good at competitive programming so let's get every single competitive programming problem ever and then let's do some data augmentation so we have even more competitive programming problems
Ilya Sutskever – We're moving from the age of scaling to the age of research Said 25 Nov 2025
There is no human analogue to pre-training — neither childhood nor evolution is the same thing as it.
I don't think there is a human analog to pre-training.
Ilya Sutskever – We're moving from the age of scaling to the age of research Said 25 Nov 2025
Show 25 more
The most fundamental thing wrong with today's models is not scale or efficiency but that they generalize dramatically worse than people do.
The thing which I think is the most fundamental is that these models somehow just generalize dramatically worse than people.
Ilya Sutskever – We're moving from the age of scaling to the age of research Said 25 Nov 2025
Value functions only make reinforcement learning faster: anything you can do with one you can also do without it, just more slowly.
I want to like emphasize that I think the value function is something like it's going to make RL more efficient and I think that makes a difference but I think that anything you can do with a value function you can do without just more slowly.
Ilya Sutskever – We're moving from the age of scaling to the age of research Said 25 Nov 2025
The human value function is extraordinarily robust — addiction aside — which is why a person can judge their own performance at a skill they have only just started.
They have a general sense which is also by the way extremely robust in people like whatever it is the human value function whatever the human value function is with a few exceptions around addiction it's actually very very robust
Ilya Sutskever – We're moving from the age of scaling to the age of research Said 25 Nov 2025
Our built-in emotions were tuned for a world that no longer exists, and hunger is one that now fails to guide us correctly.
I think for example our intuitive feeling of hunger is not succeeding in guiding us correctly in this world with an abundance of food.
Ilya Sutskever – We're moving from the age of scaling to the age of research Said 25 Nov 2025
That people are good at maths and coding, which evolution never selected for, shows human learning is not a complicated evolutionary prior but something more fundamental.
What I meant to say is that language math and coding and especially math and coding suggests that whatever it is that makes people good at learning is probably not so much a complicated prior but something more some fundamental thing.
Ilya Sutskever – We're moving from the age of scaling to the age of research Said 25 Nov 2025
A five-year-old's vision is already good enough to drive a car, on a tiny and strikingly undiverse amount of data.
At least for me, when I remember myself being 5 years old, my I was I was very excited about cars back then, and I'm pretty sure my car recognition was more than adequate for self-driving already.
Ilya Sutskever – We're moving from the age of scaling to the age of research Said 25 Nov 2025
Another hundredfold of scale would not transform anything; the field is back in the age of research, only now with big computers.
Like it would be different for sure but like is the belief that if you just 100x the scale everything would be transformed. I don't think that's true. So it's back to the age of research again just with big computers.
Ilya Sutskever – We're moving from the age of scaling to the age of research Said 25 Nov 2025
"Scaling" was powerful because it was one word: naming a research direction is what tells a whole field what to do next.
And it's just this, this is an example of how language affects thought. Scaling is what just one word, but it's such a powerful word because it informs people what to do.
Ilya Sutskever – We're moving from the age of scaling to the age of research Said 25 Nov 2025
The age of scaling sucked the air out of the room and left the field with more companies than ideas, by quite a bit.
And so because scaling sucked out all the air in the room, everyone started to do the same thing. We got to the point where uh we are in a world where there are more companies than ideas by quite a bit.
Ilya Sutskever – We're moving from the age of scaling to the age of research Said 25 Nov 2025
Research needs some compute but it is far from obvious that it needs the largest amount of compute in the world.
So there definitely for for research you need like definitely some amount of compute but it's far from obvious that you need the absolutely largest amount of compute ever for research.
Ilya Sutskever – We're moving from the age of scaling to the age of research Said 25 Nov 2025
Letting the public see a powerful AI does something no essay about AI can do, and that is a real reason not to straight-shot superintelligence.
Like basically I think I think that there is a big benefit from AI being in the public and that would be a reason for us to not be quite straight shot.
Ilya Sutskever – We're moving from the age of scaling to the age of research Said 25 Nov 2025
AI should be deployed incrementally and in advance, because a system that does not yet exist is one almost nobody can imagine.
one of the one of the ways in which my thinking has been changing is that I now place more importance on AI being deployed incrementally and in advance.
Ilya Sutskever – We're moving from the age of scaling to the age of research Said 25 Nov 2025
The whole problem of AI and AGI is the power, and nothing else about it is the problem.
Indeed, the whole problem, what is the problem of AI and AGI? The whole problem is the power. The whole problem is the power. When the power is really big, what's going to happen?
Ilya Sutskever – We're moving from the age of scaling to the age of research Said 25 Nov 2025
Once AI starts to feel powerful rather than mistake-prone, every AI company will become far more paranoid about safety than it is today.
I do think that at some point the AI will start to feel powerful actually and I think when that happens we will see a big change in the way all AI companies approach safety.
Ilya Sutskever – We're moving from the age of scaling to the age of research Said 25 Nov 2025
It will be easier to build an AI that cares about all sentient life than one that cares about humans alone, because the AI itself will be sentient.
I think in particular it will be there's a case to be made that it will be easier to build an AI that cares about sentient life than an AI that cares about human life alone because the AI itself will be sentient.
Ilya Sutskever – We're moving from the age of scaling to the age of research Said 25 Nov 2025
Capping the power of the most powerful superintelligence would be materially helpful, whatever the difficulty of doing it.
Number three, I think it would be really materially helpful if the power of the most powerful super intelligence was somehow capped because it would address a lot of these concerns.
Ilya Sutskever – We're moving from the age of scaling to the age of research Said 25 Nov 2025
A human being is not an AGI: we lack a huge amount of knowledge and rely on continual learning instead, so continual learning is what superintelligence should mean.
A human being, a human being lacks a huge amount of knowledge. Instead, we rely on continual learning. We rely on continual learning.
Ilya Sutskever – We're moving from the age of scaling to the age of research Said 25 Nov 2025
Broad deployment of AI that can learn on the job will very likely produce rapid economic growth for some period of time.
But I think the idea of very rapid economic growth for some time, I think it's very possible from broad deployment.
Ilya Sutskever – We're moving from the age of scaling to the age of research Said 25 Nov 2025
The AI companies' strategies will converge, because as AI grows more powerful it becomes clearer to everyone what the strategy should be.
I maintain that in the end there will be a convergence of strategies. So I think there will be a convergence of strategies where at some point as AI becomes more powerful it's going to become more or less clearer to everyone what the strategy should be.
Ilya Sutskever – We're moving from the age of scaling to the age of research Said 25 Nov 2025
Even with human-like learners, competition will split the AI market into specialised niches rather than hand it to one company.
I think what's going to happen is that the way competition like competition loves specialization and you see it in the market, you see it in evolution as well. So you're going to have lots of different niches and you're going to have lots of different companies who are occupying different niches
Ilya Sutskever – We're moving from the age of scaling to the age of research Said 25 Nov 2025
A million copies of one researcher would hit diminishing returns quickly, because what research needs is people who think differently.
I think I think there'll definitely be there'll be diminishing returns because you want you want people who think differently rather than the same. I think that if they were literal copies of me, I'm not sure how much more incremental value you'd get.
Ilya Sutskever – We're moving from the age of scaling to the age of research Said 25 Nov 2025
Models resemble each other because pre-training is the same everywhere; what differentiates labs now is RL and post-training.
So the reason there has been no diversity I believe is because of pre-training. All the pre-trained models are the same pretty much because the pre-train on the same data.
Ilya Sutskever – We're moving from the age of scaling to the age of research Said 25 Nov 2025
Self-play as it was done in the past is too narrow: it only ever develops a small set of skills like negotiation and strategising.
Now the the thing is that selfplay at least the way it was done in the past when you have agents which are somehow compete with each other it's only good for developing a certain set of skills it is too narrow.
Ilya Sutskever – We're moving from the age of scaling to the age of research Said 25 Nov 2025
A top-down aesthetic belief is what sustains a researcher when the experiments contradict them, because data alone cannot tell a wrong idea from a bug.
And then the top down belief is the thing that sustains you when the experiments contradict you. Because if you just trust the data all the time, well, sometimes you can be doing a correct thing, but there's a bug.
Ilya Sutskever – We're moving from the age of scaling to the age of research Said 25 Nov 2025
The long-run equilibrium with powerful AI may require people to merge with it, so that whatever the AI understands is transmitted wholesale to its human.
And the solution is if people become part AI with some kind of neural link++ because what will happen as a result is that now the AI understands something and we understand it too like because now the understanding is transmitted wholesale.
Ilya Sutskever – We're moving from the age of scaling to the age of research Said 25 Nov 2025
What is a korrent?
A korrent is a belief a person has stated in their own words: one sentence stating the claim, backed by a quote and a source, kept at korrents.com.
Under a name here, the quoted block is what they actually said. The korrent beneath it is the claim those words support, in korrents' wording — tap it to see the record, its source, and who else holds it.
Nobody here wrote their own korrents. They are compiled from public statements, and a person can change their mind, which is recorded too.
About the English under a post
Some people here publish in a language other than English. Where they do, this site shows a machine translation beneath the post, in this typeface — the site's own, not theirs.
The post itself is never changed, moved or hidden: what is set in the serif above is exactly what the person published, and it is what to quote them on. A translation can be wrong in ways that matter, especially about tone.
Only the post's own words are translated. A quoted post, a linked article and a belief on korrents.com are left in their original language.