ppll

Eleanor Janega

Medieval historian at the LSE; writes Going Medieval and The Middle Ages: A Graphic History, and spends a lot of it correcting what people think the period was like.

Eleanor Janega did not write this page. ppll compiled it from their own words, each linked to the source. Is this you? · Report a mistake

Follow

Latest Bluesky

What they believe

The bold line is korrents’ wording; the quote is theirs. These 2: what they wrote before what they said aloud, one per source, newest first.

All 6 beliefs, on korrents

Everything, newest first — across every channel.

Sources

4 November

Eleanor JanegaBluesky

22 August

Eleanor Janegax.com

12 August

Eleanor Janegax.com

31 July

Eleanor Janegax.com

29 July

Eleanor Janegax.com

24 July

Eleanor Janegax.com

25 November 2025

Eleanor JanegaKorrents

From one piece On contrarian history 4 beliefs · going-medieval.com

+ 1 more

7 November 2025

Eleanor Janegax.com

22 October 2025

Eleanor Janegax.com

21 October 2025

Eleanor JanegaBlog
  • On AI and the golem

8 October 2025

Eleanor Janegax.com

1 October 2025

Eleanor Janegax.com

9 July 2025

30 April 2025

Eleanor JanegaKorrents

From one piece On what Americans know about medieval history 2 beliefs · going-medieval.com

31 March 2025

12 February 2025

Eleanor JanegaBlog
  • On what we choose to remember

30 October 2024

Eleanor JanegaBlog
  • On spooky animals

27 September 2024

Eleanor JanegaBlog
  • On side hustles

21 August 2024

Eleanor JanegaBlog
  • On body count

27 June 2024

The whole feed →

Beliefs

  • Korrents What they believe 6 beliefs — each backed by an exact quote.

    Each is a — compiled by korrents.com, not by them: the one-line wordings are korrents', the quotes are theirs.

    Recent

    • There is no such thing as revisionist history: re-evaluating the sources and controlling for bias is simply what writing history is.
      There is no such thing as revisionist history. Writing history is a constant process of re-evaluation of sources and attempts to control for the biases of the past as well as our own.

      On contrarian history Said 25 Nov 2025

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

    • The Roman Empire was not necessary to keep industry going: metal production in Britain rose after the Romans withdrew.
      The Roman Empire, therefore, is actually not necessary for keeping industry going.

      On contrarian history Said 25 Nov 2025

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

    • We picture the past as populated entirely by the wealthy, because the wealthy are whose documents and buildings happened to survive.
      Because of how source survival works, or indeed, how architectural survival works, we are often encouraged to think of the past as a place populated entirely by the wealthy elite.

      On contrarian history Said 25 Nov 2025

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

    Show 3 more
    • There was no "Dark Ages": the term described gaps in the surviving sources, and its popular use is not a live scholarly position but a settled error.
      Further, the fact that there is no such thing as a ‘Dark Ages’ and that a term we used for source survival has escaped containment and been rendered meaningless by a bunch of poorly read self-congratulatory dolts is, in fact, what we call ‘settled academic fact’.

      On contrarian history Said 25 Nov 2025

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

    • How harshly people judge the Middle Ages tracks how little they know about it.
      Clearly as well we see that the more people know about the medieval period, the more likely they are to be correct about it.

      On what Americans know about medieval history Said 30 Apr 2025

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

    • The Renaissance and early modern period were not a better time to be alive than the Middle Ages they are said to have rescued Europe from.
      I am not here to tell you that the medieval period is a specifically peaceful time, but it pales in comparison to what goes down in the early modern period, in which both the apparently beloved Renaissance and Enlightenment periods lie.

      On what Americans know about medieval history Said 30 Apr 2025

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

      Europe

    Beliefs others hold too

    • The Renaissance and early modern period were not a better time to be alive than the Middle Ages they are said to have rescued Europe from. 2 hold this
      I am not here to tell you that the medieval period is a specifically peaceful time, but it pales in comparison to what goes down in the early modern period, in which both the apparently beloved Renaissance and Enlightenment periods lie.

      On what Americans know about medieval history Said 30 Apr 2025

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

      Europe

    All 6 beliefs →

What is a korrent?

A korrent is a belief a person has stated in their own words: one sentence stating the claim, backed by a quote and a source, kept at korrents.com.

Under a name here, the quoted block is what they actually said. The korrent beneath it is the claim those words support, in korrents' wording — tap it to see the record, its source, and who else holds it.

Nobody here wrote their own korrents. They are compiled from public statements, and a person can change their mind, which is recorded too.

Recommends rcmnd

Where they publish

About the English under a post

Some people here publish in a language other than English. Where they do, this site shows a machine translation beneath the post, in this typeface — the site's own, not theirs.

The post itself is never changed, moved or hidden: what is set in the serif above is exactly what the person published, and it is what to quote them on. A translation can be wrong in ways that matter, especially about tone.

Only the post's own words are translated. A quoted post, a linked article and a belief on korrents.com are left in their original language.