Alex Imas
Behavioural economist at Chicago Booth, professor of behavioural science and economics and director of AGI economics at Google DeepMind.
Alex Imas did not write this page. What is this?
It collects the places they publish and what they have said there, each linked to the source. They have no account here. Is this you? Claim it, correct it, or ask us to remove it from ppll.
Where they publish
No channels checked yet. We list a place only once someone has opened it and confirmed it is theirs, so this stays empty rather than guessing.
Beliefs
Korrents What they believe 18 beliefs — each backed by an exact quote.
Each is a — compiled by korrents.com, not by them: the one-line wordings are korrents', the quotes are theirs.
Recent
What stays scarce when almost everything is automated is the relational sector: goods and services whose value depends on a human having been in the loop.
Something like the relational sector, which is what I defined as, um, you know, basically services and goods where the fact that the human was in the loop was actually part of the value of that product.
The better AI gets, the smaller its share of the economy might get – Alex Imas and Phil Trammell Said 4 Jun 2026
Individual economists' forecasts about AI and the labour market are close to worthless, and aggregated forecasts from prediction markets should replace them.
rather than thinking about individual forecasts like what me and Phil are going to do, rather looking at kind of like basically generating prediction markets, where you get aggregate forecasts, where you get like kind of wisdom of the crowd effects. And kind of the reason that I think this is because we have been famously terrible at forecasting.
The better AI gets, the smaller its share of the economy might get – Alex Imas and Phil Trammell Said 4 Jun 2026
David Ricardo's prediction that the machines would take those jobs was exactly right, and he would still be astonished by today's employment rate.
And if you look at Ricardo's predictions, they're actually right. If you look at all those jobs that made money in Ricardo's time, they got automated. So, if I was David Ricardo and I woke up and somebody told me all those jobs did get automated. And you ask me David Ricardo, like what do you think the prime age employment rate is in 2026? I think he would be surprised if you told him it was the highest it's ever been other than 2000.
The better AI gets, the smaller its share of the economy might get – Alex Imas and Phil Trammell Said 4 Jun 2026
Show 15 more
Economics cannot say what AI will do to work because the necessary data does not exist; what is needed is a Manhattan Project for data.
we don't have any data. I've been kind of saying we need a Manhattan Project for data. We don't have data on basically consumer demand elasticities. We don't know what they are.
The better AI gets, the smaller its share of the economy might get – Alex Imas and Phil Trammell Said 4 Jun 2026
The ballerina is the wrong picture of surviving human work: the relational sector is one task left inside an ordinary job, like a doctor giving the diagnosis.
the ballerina and the kind of performer, that's the wrong reference class. Right now we have a lot of jobs where you have different tasks. So this is the task-based model jobs where you have like a lot of different tasks. So like a doctor, what is their job? They're filling out insurance documents. They're you know, going and like calling different pharmaceutical companies. And one of their tasks is to actually see the patient and talk to them, but that's like actually not the main part part of the job.
The better AI gets, the smaller its share of the economy might get – Alex Imas and Phil Trammell Said 4 Jun 2026
People value a human-made good for the connection to its maker, which is why the premium disappears once five hundred copies exist.
So with one, you get the effect that the person produced art print is valued much much higher than the than the AI version. And then what we do is to say there's in a set of other conditions, there's 500 of these being produced. So for the human made one, the price goes down a lot because it's no longer seen as like you're not like making a connection with this one artist versus with AI, there's no difference. AI is already viewed as like a commodity.
The better AI gets, the smaller its share of the economy might get – Alex Imas and Phil Trammell Said 4 Jun 2026
The relational story only holds if a human is not like a horse: replacing them has to lower the value of the output, not just change the input.
The only way this relational story works and this is what we need more more data on is if it's not a human is not a horse in the sense that it is providing value from the output where if you replace the human, the the value of the output decreases.
The better AI gets, the smaller its share of the economy might get – Alex Imas and Phil Trammell Said 4 Jun 2026
The worst AI employment scenario is not a crash but a slow drip, where people are quietly re-absorbed into worse-paid work over twenty years.
I think in some ways like one of the worst scenarios is a drip scenario because of the political economy piece. Right? Because like you know, people essentially what you what you might see is like people not really being unemployed in mass, but kind of like moving into sectors that pay them less money, kind of basically getting uh what happened with phone operators in in in the mid-century of the of the between 1920 and 1940, phone operators were completely automated, right? But it took 20 years even though the technology existed.
The better AI gets, the smaller its share of the economy might get – Alex Imas and Phil Trammell Said 4 Jun 2026
A universal basic income is a dangerous power-sharing arrangement, because it puts everyone's basic needs at the mercy of whoever holds office.
Like right now we're endowed with labor that can turn into uh that can turn into income. When that is no longer the case and we are now at the mercy of the of the elected official for like basic needs, right? So that to me feels like a power sharing arrangement that's really dangerous.
The better AI gets, the smaller its share of the economy might get – Alex Imas and Phil Trammell Said 4 Jun 2026
There is still no white-collar apocalypse in the data: you have to squint to see anything, and even junior developer hiring is below trend rather than falling.
They just recently released a report, and I think like you really have to squint to see anything happening. Like basically, if you want to take kind of like uh an an approach across the entire economy and looking at even looking at like software engineering, like the most exposed sort of sectors, there's just like not really anything going on. There might be a little bit of a signal about like junior developers getting jobs less than before, and that but that's like a less than before rather than a level shift.
The better AI gets, the smaller its share of the economy might get – Alex Imas and Phil Trammell Said 4 Jun 2026
Some firms are laying people off mainly so as not to look behind on AI, in a cascade of keeping up with the Joneses.
let's say we get into a narrative where like if you're a firm and you're not laying people off, then you're seen as like not adapting AI enough. So like then you'll get you're going to just get a cascade effect of firms like just needing to keep up with the Joneses in terms of like starting to lay people off.
The better AI gets, the smaller its share of the economy might get – Alex Imas and Phil Trammell Said 4 Jun 2026
An AI-caused recession requires the owners of capital to hit a hard ceiling on spending and then refuse to invest the rest, which is a very improbable combination.
So, what you need is that basically demand to be bounded, like a hard bound, not even like a soft sort of like diminishing sensitivity. You need for them to eventually say, "I've had enough. I don't want to spend any more money." And for that money to not enter as investment.
The better AI gets, the smaller its share of the economy might get – Alex Imas and Phil Trammell Said 4 Jun 2026
Professions like law will stay human for regulatory rather than relational reasons: you need somebody who can hold a licence, be blamed and be fired.
So, like with lawyers particularly, you need some entity to back up the product. You need kind of like an ownership of the product. You need somebody to be able to fire or or hire, like licensing issues. There's a lot of like sort of like regulatory layers that are like also going to be keeping even if there's no relational element human in the loop that have nothing to do with like the ability of the human to actually perform the service.
The better AI gets, the smaller its share of the economy might get – Alex Imas and Phil Trammell Said 4 Jun 2026
Natural selection will strengthen the human preference for other humans rather than erode it, because the people who resist outsourcing their social life are the ones who find mates.
Which of those two people are going to reproduce, find a mate, all of these sorts of things? I think the answer is kind of clear, right? It's the second one that has the preference for other people.
The better AI gets, the smaller its share of the economy might get – Alex Imas and Phil Trammell Said 4 Jun 2026
If people become satiated with capital, the returns to accumulating it fall and the rich start consuming again instead of compounding.
But, if we get into a situation where people are satiated with capital, um then the returns to accumulating capital are going to be lower. And so, then these rich people are going to be consuming more.
The better AI gets, the smaller its share of the economy might get – Alex Imas and Phil Trammell Said 4 Jun 2026
The biggest gap in economics right now is that almost nobody is thinking about what AI does to middle-income developing countries.
I think the biggest lack of resources that we have allocated in the economic profession is thinking about middle-income developing countries in the in the age of AI.
The better AI gets, the smaller its share of the economy might get – Alex Imas and Phil Trammell Said 4 Jun 2026
Whether AI's gains are widely shared turns on whether it is like electricity, where the users captured the benefit, or like social media, where the platform did.
because a lot with electricity, a lot of the downstream benefits actually came to like the users of the electricity rather than the rather than the actual entity producing the electricity. On the other hand, with social media, it was the opposite case, right? Social media, you know, it was everywhere. Everybody uses social media, but the rents went to the platform.
The better AI gets, the smaller its share of the economy might get – Alex Imas and Phil Trammell Said 4 Jun 2026
A country outside the AI supply chain should just buy the index — which works only in the world where AI ends up commoditised rather than concentrated.
So, I think there is a world where it is concentrated, in which case it's going to be really hard to index AGI. There is another world where it is not It's electricity, then like basically every company has access to AGI. So, you just buy you use buy the index. So, like, you know, Nigeria just needs to buy the index.
The better AI gets, the smaller its share of the economy might get – Alex Imas and Phil Trammell Said 4 Jun 2026
What is a korrent?
A korrent is a belief a person has stated in their own words: one sentence stating the claim, backed by a quote and a source, kept at korrents.com.
Under a name here, the quoted block is what they actually said. The korrent beneath it is the claim those words support, in korrents' wording — tap it to see the record, its source, and who else holds it.
Nobody here wrote their own korrents. They are compiled from public statements, and a person can change their mind, which is recorded too.
About the English under a post
Some people here publish in a language other than English. Where they do, this site shows a machine translation beneath the post, in this typeface — the site's own, not theirs.
The post itself is never changed, moved or hidden: what is set in the serif above is exactly what the person published, and it is what to quote them on. A translation can be wrong in ways that matter, especially about tone.
Only the post's own words are translated. A quoted post, a linked article and a belief on korrents.com are left in their original language.