Albert Cheng
Head of growth at Chess.com, previously growth and monetization lead at Grammarly and Duolingo and a product manager at Google.
Albert Cheng did not write this page. What is this?
It collects the places they publish and what they have said there, each linked to the source. They have no account here. Is this you? Claim it, correct it, or ask us to remove it from ppll.
Where they publish
No channels checked yet. We list a place only once someone has opened it and confirmed it is theirs, so this stays empty rather than guessing.
Beliefs
Korrents What they believe 26 beliefs — each backed by an exact quote.
Each is a — compiled by korrents.com, not by them: the one-line wordings are korrents', the quotes are theirs.
Recent
A growth team that only explores turns scattershot, and one that only exploits saturates — the job is to keep oscillating between the two.
If you do too much exploration, you can have your team feel a little bit too scattershot, just trying a 100 different random ideas. What's the through line? What's the strategy? How do you pattern match, you know, successes across them? And if you do too much in exploitation, which is often the MMO of growth teams, it can lead to this like saturation and stagnation where you're just locally maximizing a thing.
Finding hidden growth opportunities in your product | Albert Cheng (Duolingo, Grammarly, Chess.com) Said 5 Oct 2025
After a defeat people want encouragement, not a list of their mistakes — so a learning product should lead with what the user did well.
When you lose a game now as opposed to surfacing your blunders and your like horrible stuff that you did, we flip it on its head. And so we show you your brilliant moves, your best moves. And we have coach say something encouraging. You know, losing just part of learning like keep it up, that type of thing. That change alone was pretty dramatic for us. It grew game reviews by 25%, subscriptions by 20%
Finding hidden growth opportunities in your product | Albert Cheng (Duolingo, Grammarly, Chess.com) Said 5 Oct 2025
Only 30 to 50 percent of product experiments win, because consumer behaviour is too unpredictable to be predicted from a hypothesis.
I mean in my experience the typical win rate and I hate to use that term for experiments is is often something like 30 to 50%. Like usually you're not actually get like you're trying a bunch of things a lot of hypotheses turn out not to be true. you know, consumer products are very unpredictable like that.
Finding hidden growth opportunities in your product | Albert Cheng (Duolingo, Grammarly, Chess.com) Said 5 Oct 2025
Show 23 more
A rising share of statistically insignificant experiments is the signal that a team has exploited an area too far and should go back to exploring.
And if I'm starting to see like more and more experiments that are not statistically significant, that may be a signal to me to say, okay, we might have kind of tried to exploit a little bit too far. Like there might not be as much juice to squeeze.
Finding hidden growth opportunities in your product | Albert Cheng (Duolingo, Grammarly, Chess.com) Said 5 Oct 2025
Most of the questions people have about a company's data are never asked, and giving them a machine to ask instead of a colleague uncovers them.
And I think what's also kind of interesting is that just human nature is that if you have a question that you feel like, you know, you might be a bit embarrassed to ask or you don't want to bother someone, you just don't ask the question, right? And so by the nature of having these tools, you get actually a pretty large explosion of questions being asked.
Finding hidden growth opportunities in your product | Albert Cheng (Duolingo, Grammarly, Chess.com) Said 5 Oct 2025
AI has made prototyping fast but has not yet joined it to the workflow, so at any real scale the handoffs between functions are still there.
I would say though that something that is kind of annoying to me is that we haven't yet figured out the bridging from the tinkering to the workflow quite as seamlessly as I would like.
Finding hidden growth opportunities in your product | Albert Cheng (Duolingo, Grammarly, Chess.com) Said 5 Oct 2025
A freemium product's free tier should sample everything the paid product can do, because a limited free experience teaches users the product is limited.
and so I think this is interesting just modernization learning that especially if you work on a premium product try to have your free product be a reflection of like everything that your product can offer you. Obviously, to an extent, there's some costs involved with some of the paid features and things like that, but it generally will pay it for itself if you're able to put your best foot forward um and go do that.
Finding hidden growth opportunities in your product | Albert Cheng (Duolingo, Grammarly, Chess.com) Said 5 Oct 2025
Reverse trials work where a product accumulates lock-in, which is why they suit B2B tools and rarely beat an ordinary free trial in consumer products.
I think if you have especially a B2B feature where you may have some lock in reverse trials can be super powerful. You just want to get people in there. You don't need to ask for their credit card because they're using your CRM or they're investing quite a lot of time in like building out, you know, material and content. And so by the time that window drops, you actually like feel, oh man, I probably should keep this and and start paying. I think for a lot of consumer products, it's a little bit harder for that to work. And so I've typically seen more just normal free trials be be the norm.
Finding hidden growth opportunities in your product | Albert Cheng (Duolingo, Grammarly, Chess.com) Said 5 Oct 2025
Retention is what makes a consumer subscription business possible: without it the whole burden falls on getting a stranger to pay on day one.
Yeah, I mean user retention is gold for consumer subscription companies. If you don't retain your users, then a lot of the onus is on getting them to pay on like day one. That's super hard, right?
Finding hidden growth opportunities in your product | Albert Cheng (Duolingo, Grammarly, Chess.com) Said 5 Oct 2025
A consumer app with 30 to 40 percent day-one retention is in solid shape, and much below that calls the users' intent into question.
I think when you have your D1 retention somewhere around like the 30 or 40% mark, like that's quite solid, I think, for for a consumer app.
Finding hidden growth opportunities in your product | Albert Cheng (Duolingo, Grammarly, Chess.com) Said 5 Oct 2025
For a daily-frequency product it is existing-user retention, not new-user retention, that compounds — and mature companies should put most of their energy there.
I think especially if you have a product that has daily frequency like that's actually the retention that matters the most is that like of your existing user base that has developed a habitual pattern how sticky is your product and it's that retention rate that really compounds and build that builds that daily habit.
Finding hidden growth opportunities in your product | Albert Cheng (Duolingo, Grammarly, Chess.com) Said 5 Oct 2025
For a product you install rather than open, activation is the decisive moment and it carries the user for years.
One exception is that Grammarly was a different type of product in that you install it and you don't proactively open it every day. So that was kind of interesting to me because I assume that you should always just focus on existing user retention. But for a product like Grammarly, it's actually the activation, installation, aha moment that's really really critical and will carry the user for a very very long time.
Finding hidden growth opportunities in your product | Albert Cheng (Duolingo, Grammarly, Chess.com) Said 5 Oct 2025
A mature product's growth comes from resurrecting dormant users, so the returning-user experience deserves to be designed as deliberately as onboarding.
And it's actually worth spending some time making sure that that kind of resurrected, for lack of a better word, experience inside the product is really excellent and that you find novel ways to try to bring them back.
Finding hidden growth opportunities in your product | Albert Cheng (Duolingo, Grammarly, Chess.com) Said 5 Oct 2025
Duolingo's real competence is motivation and habit formation, and language learning was only the first thing it applied that to.
I actually in many ways see language learning as like their first vehicle. And what they have a superpower in is that again, the motivation, the habits, etc.
Finding hidden growth opportunities in your product | Albert Cheng (Duolingo, Grammarly, Chess.com) Said 5 Oct 2025
Brand marketing and growth experimentation are not rivals — a product personality carried into social media becomes fuel for the measured growth work.
Yeah, I mean I used to think it was versus, but now I realize that they combine really well. It could be rocket fuel for for your growth.
Finding hidden growth opportunities in your product | Albert Cheng (Duolingo, Grammarly, Chess.com) Said 5 Oct 2025
Steady experimentation is what a growth team controls, but the step changes come from outside waves the company did not create and would be foolish to ignore.
And it's like the growth experimentation is more the the the slow and steady or fast and steady, I should say, uh approach where you're just continually iterating. You're making the product experience better, but then every so often, right, there's a big wave that comes in. you can quadruple your, you know, registrations overnights and yeah, you'd be a fool not to take advantage of that.
Finding hidden growth opportunities in your product | Albert Cheng (Duolingo, Grammarly, Chess.com) Said 5 Oct 2025
Large language models are bad at chess: pattern recognition is not the same capability as searching one position very deeply.
You know, interestingly, LM themselves are quite bad at playing chess. Like, they hallucinate moves. They look at patterns, right? They're they're very good at pattern recognition, but not so good at going super super super deep on a specific chess thing.
Finding hidden growth opportunities in your product | Albert Cheng (Duolingo, Grammarly, Chess.com) Said 5 Oct 2025
Growth is not metrics hacking: the job is to connect users to the value of the product.
I like to describe growth as the the job is to connect users to the value of your product.
Finding hidden growth opportunities in your product | Albert Cheng (Duolingo, Grammarly, Chess.com) Said 5 Oct 2025
Working at a company turns you into a power user, which is why pattern matching fails and even an experienced growth leader is wrong all the time.
I've worked a lot of companies right but I'm wrong all the time and I think consumer behavior can be very fickle and especially when you work at a company you become a power user naturally. So sometimes you you may forget like what the actual user experience is for a brand new user.
Finding hidden growth opportunities in your product | Albert Cheng (Duolingo, Grammarly, Chess.com) Said 5 Oct 2025
The value of an ambitious experiment target is not hitting it but the conversation about what would have to be true to hit it.
And a thousand experiments by itself, like if you just did that, but you didn't learn, you didn't make an impact, and that's kind of a waste of time, right? The whole point of setting a goal is that you can have conversations about what would need to be true to actually hit that goal.
Finding hidden growth opportunities in your product | Albert Cheng (Duolingo, Grammarly, Chess.com) Said 5 Oct 2025
The experimentation system — a growth model and correct instrumentation — matters more than any individual experiment.
The system matters just as much as any given experiment. Probably even more. Right. I think starting with a growth model so you have an understanding of how your company grows in the first place and which channels you're going to leverage is critical. You need to make sure that you are instrumenting your product in and out otherwise you're going to run experiments and have wonky results.
Finding hidden growth opportunities in your product | Albert Cheng (Duolingo, Grammarly, Chess.com) Said 5 Oct 2025
You cannot manufacture virality, but you can find the moments users already screenshot and make those moments far better.
So as opposed to going against I guess human intuition and trying to get them to share stuff that they otherwise wouldn't on the margins want to share like lean into it more actually like grab the moments where users are already organically screenshotting and make those much much much better and you can kind of 5x or 10x and and drive a lot of growth that way too.
Finding hidden growth opportunities in your product | Albert Cheng (Duolingo, Grammarly, Chess.com) Said 5 Oct 2025
Gamification needs three things at once — a tight core loop, a metagame to strive at, and a profile that accumulates the user's investment.
Then you need a metag game, which for Duolingo is kind of like the path, but it's also the leaderboard, achievements, kind of long-term things that you're going to strive to such that you have like long-term, I guess, motivation uh to continue doing the thing. And then the profile is also critical because you build up a profile over time. It's a reflection of your investment inside the product experience. And so when you nail those three things, you can end up with a long-term learning journey that can be quite successful.
Finding hidden growth opportunities in your product | Albert Cheng (Duolingo, Grammarly, Chess.com) Said 5 Oct 2025
Most newcomers to a skill lose their first encounter with it, and losing costs retention — so beginners need a route around the real game.
like what we see is that over 75% of our new users, they classify themselves as like, I'm completely new to chess or I'm a beginner. And unfortunately, if you're new to chess and you're a beginner, you're not going to have that fun of a time playing live games. We see this in the data. It's like less than a third of those users actually win their first game. And when you lose a game, user retention is 10% worse than when you win a game.
Finding hidden growth opportunities in your product | Albert Cheng (Duolingo, Grammarly, Chess.com) Said 5 Oct 2025
Agency and clock speed beat domain experience in a hire, and in a fast-moving field experience is often a crutch of habits that need discarding.
I saw some of the highest performers just being people that had very high agency, had that clock speed, had that energy. Um, yes, they they cared about the mission, but they didn't necessarily need to have deep experience on that matter. And in fact, sometimes that experience could be a crutch in certain ways. Especially in this world where the grounds are shifting so fast with AI, a lot of your like learn habits actually need to be intentionally discarded. You know, you need to have a beginner's mind on this type of stuff.
Finding hidden growth opportunities in your product | Albert Cheng (Duolingo, Grammarly, Chess.com) Said 5 Oct 2025
Doing PR before you have evidence customers want the thing is risky, because the publicity creates a sunk cost that makes the team see a failing product through.
And the third one is like we did a lot of actually PR uh prior to the service going out just to get the word out. Um and you know PR has has its time and place. Uh but I think doing it before you have validation that customers definitely want the thing is quite risky. It can lead to a lot of sunk cost uh once you get it out because you're you're just you know you need to see it through.
Finding hidden growth opportunities in your product | Albert Cheng (Duolingo, Grammarly, Chess.com) Said 5 Oct 2025
What is a korrent?
A korrent is a belief a person has stated in their own words: one sentence stating the claim, backed by a quote and a source, kept at korrents.com.
Under a name here, the quoted block is what they actually said. The korrent beneath it is the claim those words support, in korrents' wording — tap it to see the record, its source, and who else holds it.
Nobody here wrote their own korrents. They are compiled from public statements, and a person can change their mind, which is recorded too.
About the English under a post
Some people here publish in a language other than English. Where they do, this site shows a machine translation beneath the post, in this typeface — the site's own, not theirs.
The post itself is never changed, moved or hidden: what is set in the serif above is exactly what the person published, and it is what to quote them on. A translation can be wrong in ways that matter, especially about tone.
Only the post's own words are translated. A quoted post, a linked article and a belief on korrents.com are left in their original language.