From one piece Deciphering Secrets of Ancient Civilizations, Noah’s Ark, and Flood Myths | Lex Fridman Podcast #487 27 beliefs, in the piece's order there
-
korrents.com
The British Museum is a museum of ideas rather than of art, and no other museum in the world has that task.Their words
It is actually a special place because you cannot point to another museum in the world with the same task. For example, the Louvre is basically a museum of art, basically a museum of art, not a museum of ideas.
-
Their words
He’s called the Father of Assyriology, but I think he’s the Stepfather of Assyriology because when he first got these inscriptions, he wrote a long book about it, which was almost entirely wrong.
-
korrents.com
Grieving for years after a death is infantile, because everybody was always going to die.Their words
So if you’re very fond of somebody or you love somebody and they die, it’s kind of infantile to whine about it ever after. Because what did you think was gonna happen? Either you or them.
+ 24 more
-
korrents.com
The people of the ancient world were not less advanced than we are; they were probably indistinguishable from us.Their words
I honestly believe that the people at this time were not stupid. They weren’t gorillas. They weren’t less advanced than we are. They were probably indistinguishable from what we are.
-
Their words
Because I think that the modern adherence to the electronic universe is disastrous for humans, and because it reduces the vitality of the human component. I think it’s restrictive in a way that people don’t realize until it’s too late.
-
Their words
But it has built within it, is the way I understand the game plays, a measurable quota of strategy. It’s a mix of probability and strategy.
-
Their words
Before the flood, the gods had not created death. So I think the noise was a reflex of the fact there were just too many animals, too many people, and they had to do something about it.
-
korrents.com
The ark was never built; it is a literary construction out of the fact that the people who survived were in boats.Their words
I think it’s a literary construction out of the reality that people who did survive were on boats.
-
Their words
But I do believe that the story in Mesopotamia owes its inception to a disastrous flood, but nothing global. Nothing that touched America or China or Birmingham.
-
korrents.com
The text of the Hebrew Bible was drawn up in Babylonian exile, to stop the Judean refugees dissolving into Babylonia.Their words
And the authorities who were there prevented this by drawing up a kind of charter of their history, explaining things from the beginning of time up until now, how it happened and what happened, and it was all intentional. So that is, in my opinion, the driving force behind the Hebrew text.
-
korrents.com
Genesis and Gilgamesh are not two independent accounts of one flood; one is literarily dependent on the other.Their words
So this was not only in the Epic of Gilgamesh, but it was also in the Book of Genesis. So what it meant was that it wasn’t… You couldn’t have two stories… It wasn’t two stories about the same thing. It was literary dependence.
-
korrents.com
Religious feeling fluctuates and is usually a response to need, not a steady state of awe.Their words
It’s a kind of conception that’s not actually based on reality, that the individual’s response to religious stimuli fluctuates and is varied and is often a response to need.
-
Their words
But they didn’t believe in ghosts, they took them for granted. And they didn’t believe in the gods, they took them for granted. This is a different mechanism, because nobody here in the world today takes those things for granted, just the opposite.
-
Their words
Because not having religion does not mean not having law or morality or sensitivity or consideration or love or any of those things. None of those things depends on religion, and those are the things which are important.
-
Their words
I think the big mistake for mankind was the creation of monotheistic religions, because they brought evil into the world. Because if you believe in a monotheistic religion, that means I’m right and you’re wrong if you don’t.
-
Their words
Well, you know, the truth about translation is that you never really have a word in one language which precisely equates another. You never do.
-
korrents.com
Translating Akkadian statements as certainties when they were possibilities changes the whole meaning of a text.Their words
And if you translate, “He will,” in a literary text, “He might,” then the whole text is different. The whole text is different.
-
korrents.com
Babylonian omens never meant that A causes B; the diviner could only ever say what might happen.Their words
So all you can ever do and ever, ever have been able to do is to say, “There’s a sign here that says that the queen could die,” meaning “could die,” not “will die.”
-
Their words
And it was in no one’s interest whatsoever. Nobody would ever concede any interest in the idea of literacy for all.
-
Their words
But they wouldn’t destroy the library because it was the giant brain from which the Assyrians ran a world empire, and it had all the knowledge in the world. They destroyed that? They spoke the same language, they had the same writing system. They’d have taken them all safely home, cart after cart after cart.
-
Their words
So our view of it is skewed by the nature of the material, and sometimes the material is opulent and benevolent, but not always, and sometimes the people who work with skewed material don’t even realize how skewed it is.
-
korrents.com
Assyriology has a built-in assumption that the tablets we have are roughly all there ever was, and it is absurd.Their words
but it means that Assyriologists have the inbuilt idea that what we have is something like all there ever was, which is absurd.
-
korrents.com
Inertia is nearly as strong as evolution, and people who talk about progress have no idea of it.Their words
But actually, that argument is utterly, utterly fallacious, because the process of evolution is stymied left, right, and center by inertia. Inertia is nearly as strong as evolution, and this is something that the people who talk about progress and ideas have no idea about.
-
Their words
And it’s obvious, it’s obvious that they had writing on a perishable material. They can’t just have had inscribed stone seals, and many parts of India today write on palm leaf.
-
korrents.com
There was writing at Gobekli Tepe, thousands of years before Sumer, and one stamp seal is enough to infer it.Their words
Well, that seal from Gobekli Tepe is a raindrop from which I infer writing, and it’s perfectly possible they all wrote on flat leaves.
-
Their words
And my hunch is that the archaeological evidence that we have on this score is ultimately misleading, because I think this: that probably for a very, very long time before the Sumerians, people in the world, the world of what we call the Middle East, were in contact.
-
korrents.com
The genius of writing was the moment somebody realised a picture could stand for a sound rather than for a thing.Their words
And once they had the idea that you could write sounds with pictures, that’s the crucial thing, that a picture of a foot not only meant foot but it meant the sound of the word for foot.