ppll

Ed Hawkins

Climate scientist at the National Centre for Atmospheric Science, University of Reading; IPCC AR6 lead author. Created the 'warming stripes' graphic in 2018; writes the Climate Lab Book newsletter.

Ed Hawkins did not write this page. ppll compiled it from their own words, each linked to the source. Is this you? · Report a mistake

Follow

What they believe

The bold line is korrents’ wording; the quote is theirs. These 2: what they wrote before what they said aloud, one per source, newest first.

All 10 beliefs, on korrents

Beliefs

  • Korrents What they believe 10 beliefs — each backed by an exact quote.

    Each is a — compiled by korrents.com, not by them: the one-line wordings are korrents', the quotes are theirs.

    Recent

    Show 7 more
    • The ReBASE approach provides an experimental attribution for everyday weather, globally.
      But this method is not just for extreme events - this approach provides an experimental attribution for everyday weather, globally.

      Climate Lab Book Said 24 Aug 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

    • The recent decline in aerosol emissions is not a reason to choose a human-induced climate change framing, unless discussing the recent rate of change.
      There may be reasons to choose a human-induced climate change framing but, in my view, the recent decline in aerosol emissions is not one of them, unless it is particularly important to discuss the recent rate of change.

      Climate Lab Book Said 11 Jul 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

      climate change

    • Heatwaves will continue to get hotter until global net-zero emissions are reached.
      And, of course, heatwaves will continue to get hotter and hotter and hotter until we reach global net-zero emissions.

      Climate Lab Book Said 11 Jul 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

    • The IPCC AR5 near-term warming assessment was reasonable given the published evidence at the time.
      Overall I think the assessment made by AR5 for near-term warming was reasonable given the published evidence at the time.

      Climate Lab Book Said 14 Apr 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

    • The IPCC would likely have assessed a warming range of 0.4-0.8°C rather than 0.3-0.7°C if improved observational datasets had been available.
      It is therefore probable that the IPCC would have assessed 0.4-0.8°C rather than 0.3-0.7°C had we had the improved observational datasets.

      Climate Lab Book Said 14 Apr 2026

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

    • It is likely that the same 1903 storm would have produced even heavier rainfall in a warmer world like today.
      It is therefore likely that had the same 1903 storm occurred in a warmer world like today then the already intense rainfall would have been even heavier.

      Climate Lab Book Said 26 Oct 2025

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

    • Translating past extreme weather events into a modern or future warmer climate can provide useful insights into how extreme weather will cause more damage.
      This example highlights the value of considering real events from the past, and how translating them into a modern or future warmer climate can give us useful insights into how extreme weather will now cause more damage even if the synoptic events are the same.

      Climate Lab Book Said 26 Oct 2025

      Full record — everyone who holds this →

    All 10 beliefs →

What is a korrent?

A korrent is a belief a person has stated in their own words: one sentence stating the claim, backed by a quote and a source, kept at korrents.com.

Under a name here, the quoted block is what they actually said. The korrent beneath it is the claim those words support, in korrents' wording — tap it to see the record, its source, and who else holds it.

Nobody here wrote their own korrents. They are compiled from public statements, and a person can change their mind, which is recorded too.

Where they publish

About the English under a post

Some people here publish in a language other than English. Where they do, this site shows a machine translation beneath the post, in this typeface — the site's own, not theirs.

The post itself is never changed, moved or hidden: what is set in the serif above is exactly what the person published, and it is what to quote them on. A translation can be wrong in ways that matter, especially about tone.

Only the post's own words are translated. A quoted post, a linked article and a belief on korrents.com are left in their original language.