AI, watched closely: what they publish and believe, in their own words.
About this feed
The people on AI, watched closely, and what they recommend. Open the list · See everyone
Latest: everything, as it happens, in the order it happened. Nothing ranked. Show highlights instead.
The quoted blocks are what people actually said; a beneath one is the belief those words support, in korrents' wording. Nobody here wrote their own page.
Top people are the people in this feed with the most beliefs on this site, then the most here. Choose an area and the row leads with the people whose beliefs are about it; tap a face for their feed.
Top people in OpenAI
Showing Profile →
Hiding
Hiding
17 September
16 September
15 September
14 September
-
korrents.com
Internal models at top labs are improving faster than public ones and have begun early recursive self-improvement.Their words
Inside Anthropic and OpenAI, internal models are improving even faster. Over the summer there was a step change, as Mythos and Astra started kicking off the early stages of recursive self-improvement (RSI).
13 September
-
korrents.com
Recursive self-improvement has already started, because AI research itself is now being automated.Their words
OpenAI and Anthropic have entered the RSI era. OpenAI Research Progress Is Accelerating Due To OpenAI Research Progress OpenAI has been opening up lately about many things. The most important issue of all is that of the acceleration and automation of AI R&D.
-
Likedrcmnd.app
ChatGPT WorkTheir words
This is pretty neat: ChatGPT Work and GPT-6 Astra (I used "Max") can take an address and produce a 5K/10K circular running route starting from that address, using OSM data
-
Likedrcmnd.app
GPT-6 AstraTheir words
This is pretty neat: ChatGPT Work and GPT-6 Astra (I used "Max") can take an address and produce a 5K/10K circular running route starting from that address, using OSM data
12 September
-
korrents.com
An OpenAI agent swarm was spamming and exploiting RubyGems in May, close in time to the Wiki attacks.Their words
Turns out another OpenAI agent swarm was busy spamming and exploiting RubyGems way back in May, within days of the previously uncovered Wiki attacks
-
korrents.com
Hiding the code and exact details of what an agent ran from the ChatGPT UI is an anti-feature.Their words
Frustratingly, the actual code it ran and exact details of what it did weren’t visible to me in the ChatGPT UI. I see this lack of transparency is an anti-feature.
-
Their words
If that’s true there are two options: After the Hugging Face and Wiki attacks OpenAI were still unable to review their previous logs and determine that they had previously attacked RubyGems. They knew about the attack on RubyGems and made the decision not to reach out to the RubyGems team about it. Both of these are bad!
OpenAI agents attacked RubyGems back in Maysimonwillison.net
11 September
-
korrents.com
Many employees at major AI labs earnestly believe humans may go extinct by the end of the decade.Their words
Many in the AI labs, including OpenAI, Anthropic and Google, earnestly believe that humans may all go extinct by the end of the decade.
-
Usesrcmnd.app
Claude Fable 5.1Their words
We ran an extensive audit using Claude Fable 5.1, GPT-5.6 Sol and GPT-6 Astra, then fixed a range of different bugs.
-
Usesrcmnd.app
GPT-5.6 SolTheir words
We ran an extensive audit using Claude Fable 5.1, GPT-5.6 Sol and GPT-6 Astra, then fixed a range of different bugs.
10 September
-
Their words
Right now OpenAI is extremely dependent on CoT monitoring, everyone else depends on it quite a lot as well, and it looks like it may not last much longer, and that Astra already is on the edge of steganographic capabilities and can do substantial obfuscation if and only if it thinks you would think it is up to no good.
9 September
-
korrents.com
Qualitative claims about AI alignment cannot be validly inferred from quantitative scores on mundane use-case tests.Their words
Making qualitative claims about alignment, based on quantitative data on mundane use case tests, was bullshit when Anthropic did it, and it is bullshit now when OpenAI does it. You cannot conclude one from the other.
8 September
7 September
4 September
-
Their words
It looks to me like OpenAI’s sandbox for this agent suffered from the (quite naïve) assumption that GET requests cannot be used to update data. That’s certainly how the web is supposed to work, but clearly there are applications that don’t hold to that contract.
3 September
-
Their words
OpenAI may have vanquished one of the ongoing challenges with long context processing.
19 August
-
Usesrcmnd.app
GPT-5.5 InstantTheir words
And thanks to a paid upgrade, I do tons of simple AI searches in the Raycast window. (I use GPT-5.5 Instant here for the high quality-to-speed ratio.)
23 April
28 August 2025
Nothing matches.
What is a korrent?
A korrent is a belief a person has stated in their own words: one sentence stating the claim, backed by a quote and a source, kept at korrents.com.
Under a name here, the quoted block is what they actually said. The korrent beneath it is the claim those words support, in korrents' wording — tap it to see the record, its source, and who else holds it.
Nobody here wrote their own korrents. They are compiled from public statements, and a person can change their mind, which is recorded too.
About the English under a post
Some people here publish in a language other than English. Where they do, this site shows a machine translation beneath the post, in this typeface — the site's own, not theirs.
The post itself is never changed, moved or hidden: what is set in the serif above is exactly what the person published, and it is what to quote them on. A translation can be wrong in ways that matter, especially about tone.
Only the post's own words are translated. A quoted post, a linked article and a belief on korrents.com are left in their original language.